Articles

Tax efficiency of leveraged dividends challenged by recent court decision

Tax efficiency of leveraged dividends challenged by recent court deci

Tax efficiency of leveraged dividends challenged by recent court decision

10.04.2018 BE law

Traditionally, Belgian tax law has been rather flexible in accepting the tax deductible character of interest due on leveraged financing structures. Recent court decisions, however, seem to challenge this principle.

In a decision of 9 January 2018, the Court of Appeals of Ghent disallowed the tax deductibility of interest payments made in the context of a so-called “leveraged dividend distribution".

The case related to a Belgian company that had acquired the shares of another Belgian company (the 'target company') and that had financed (part of) the purchase price with debt. The reimbursement of this acquisition debt was, in its turn, financed by a post-acquisition “super dividend distribution" by the target company. Since the target company lacked sufficient cash to actually pay out the dividend, it entered into a loan agreement with a third party financial institution to that end. The Court decided that the interest paid in relation to that third party loan was not tax deductible since the target company had not incurred these interest expenses “with a view to acquiring or preserving taxable income". 

This decision follows on another judgment of the Tribunal of First Instance of Antwerp of 29 June 2016, in which the tribunal ruled, on equivalent grounds, that interest expenses incurred in relation to an intragroup loan that was entered into to finance a decrease and reimbursement of (statutory) capital were not tax deductible either.

An appeal has been lodged against the latter decision and is currently still pending, and taking into account the very controversial nature of the reasoning applied by both the Court of Appeals of Ghent and the Tribunal of First Instance of Antwerp the expectation is that both procedures will in due time lead to a ruling by the Supreme Court. It is hazardous, however, to predict how the Supreme Court would eventually rule on the matter.

This new trend in (lower) case law (even if not final yet, and strictly speaking not binding for taxpayers that were not involved themselves in the relevant underlying cases) should nevertheless already be taken into account when structuring acquisitions. In the past, and given the absence of tax consolidation in Belgium, organizing a tax efficient acquisition of a Belgian target company typically involved some form of debt push-down, which often took the form of a leveraged dividend distribution or capital decrease (or a combination of both). If the aforementioned new case law trend would be confirmed, this may obviously jeopardize the fiscal feasibility of these types of structures, as a result of which the organization of a tax efficient debt push-down would become even more challenging than it was in the past. It goes without saying that we will carefully follow up on this matter and will let you know when there are any relevant evolutions.

To end on a positive note: in the context of the Corporate Tax Reform Act of 25 December 2017, a new tax consolidation regime (the so-called “group contribution rule") has been introduced, which will in principle apply as from tax assessment year 2020. It is, however, questionable whether this new rule will have a material positive impact on the tax effectiveness of leveraged share acquisition structures, since one of the conditions for this consolidation regime to apply is that the consolidating companies should have been affiliated without interruption throughout the four preceding taxable periods. It would be helpful that this condition be amended to either shorten the 4 year waiting period or to allow  tax consolidation by anticipation already during the aforementioned period (subject to a claw-back in case the affiliation would not be maintained throughout the entire period).

Team

Related news

18.02.2019 EU law
Erik Valgaeren moderates a panel on Data Governance and Compliance during IBA's Silicon Beach Conference

Speaking slot - The discussion topic will cover various legal aspects relating to data lifecycle management, both for personal and non personal data. These aspects will include rights in and obligations regarding data, such retention obligations and portability rights. Practical suggestions on holistic data management and the role of the chief data officer will be debated.

Read more

21.03.2019 NL law
15 aspects of Brexit you did not know

Short Reads - A Brexit without a deal, or with a deal that does not cover all relevant aspects, is still a potential scenario. We have highlighted a number of unexpected legal consequences of Brexit in such a no deal or incomplete deal scenario.

Read more

05.02.2019 NL law
Transitional rules announced for certain Dutch tax acts in case of no deal Brexit

Short Reads - On 4 February 2019, the Dutch State Secretary of Finance sent a letter to the Dutch Parliament announcing transitional rules for Dutch taxes (other than customs legislation) if there will not be a Brexit withdrawal agreement (i.e. a no deal Brexit). The letter includes an outline of the transitional rules.

Read more

22.02.2019 NL law
Dutch chapter to Chambers Global Practice Guides Corporate Tax 2019

Articles - Stibbe contributes Dutch chapter to Chambers Global Practice Guides Corporate Tax 2019. This chapter was written by Michael Molenaars, Jeroen Smits, Reinout de Boer and Rogier van der Struijk. Besides providing you with an outline of Dutch corporate income taxation, the chapter pays attention to the impact of BEPS on the Dutch corporate income tax landscape.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring