Articles

Tax efficiency of leveraged dividends challenged by recent court decision

Tax efficiency of leveraged dividends challenged by recent court deci

Tax efficiency of leveraged dividends challenged by recent court decision

10.04.2018 BE law

Traditionally, Belgian tax law has been rather flexible in accepting the tax deductible character of interest due on leveraged financing structures. Recent court decisions, however, seem to challenge this principle.

In a decision of 9 January 2018, the Court of Appeals of Ghent disallowed the tax deductibility of interest payments made in the context of a so-called “leveraged dividend distribution".

The case related to a Belgian company that had acquired the shares of another Belgian company (the 'target company') and that had financed (part of) the purchase price with debt. The reimbursement of this acquisition debt was, in its turn, financed by a post-acquisition “super dividend distribution" by the target company. Since the target company lacked sufficient cash to actually pay out the dividend, it entered into a loan agreement with a third party financial institution to that end. The Court decided that the interest paid in relation to that third party loan was not tax deductible since the target company had not incurred these interest expenses “with a view to acquiring or preserving taxable income". 

This decision follows on another judgment of the Tribunal of First Instance of Antwerp of 29 June 2016, in which the tribunal ruled, on equivalent grounds, that interest expenses incurred in relation to an intragroup loan that was entered into to finance a decrease and reimbursement of (statutory) capital were not tax deductible either.

An appeal has been lodged against the latter decision and is currently still pending, and taking into account the very controversial nature of the reasoning applied by both the Court of Appeals of Ghent and the Tribunal of First Instance of Antwerp the expectation is that both procedures will in due time lead to a ruling by the Supreme Court. It is hazardous, however, to predict how the Supreme Court would eventually rule on the matter.

This new trend in (lower) case law (even if not final yet, and strictly speaking not binding for taxpayers that were not involved themselves in the relevant underlying cases) should nevertheless already be taken into account when structuring acquisitions. In the past, and given the absence of tax consolidation in Belgium, organizing a tax efficient acquisition of a Belgian target company typically involved some form of debt push-down, which often took the form of a leveraged dividend distribution or capital decrease (or a combination of both). If the aforementioned new case law trend would be confirmed, this may obviously jeopardize the fiscal feasibility of these types of structures, as a result of which the organization of a tax efficient debt push-down would become even more challenging than it was in the past. It goes without saying that we will carefully follow up on this matter and will let you know when there are any relevant evolutions.

To end on a positive note: in the context of the Corporate Tax Reform Act of 25 December 2017, a new tax consolidation regime (the so-called “group contribution rule") has been introduced, which will in principle apply as from tax assessment year 2020. It is, however, questionable whether this new rule will have a material positive impact on the tax effectiveness of leveraged share acquisition structures, since one of the conditions for this consolidation regime to apply is that the consolidating companies should have been affiliated without interruption throughout the four preceding taxable periods. It would be helpful that this condition be amended to either shorten the 4 year waiting period or to allow  tax consolidation by anticipation already during the aforementioned period (subject to a claw-back in case the affiliation would not be maintained throughout the entire period).

Team

Related news

30.08.2019 BE law
Speaking slot: De fiscus komt op bezoek. Wat nu?

Speaking slot - Op 29 augustus gaven vennoot Henk Verstraete en medewerkster Elien Van Malder een presentatie aan de advocaten van de Nederlandstalige balie van Brussel over de (grenzen van de) fiscale controles. Daarbij werden de onderzoeksbevoegdheden van de fiscus geanalyseerd in het licht van recente arresten van het Grondwettelijk Hof, het Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens en het Hof van Justitie.

Read more

28.07.2019 NL law
Public M&A in the Netherlands – 2019

Articles - How may publicly listed business combine? What are the main laws and regulations governing business combinations and acquisitions of publicly listed companies? What are the disclosure requirements for owners of large shareholders in a public company? How are cross-border transactions structured? Do specific laws and regulations apply to cross border transactions? Allard Metzelaar and Willem Beek provide answers to these and other questions about public M&A in the Netherlands.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring