Short Reads

Countdown 5 weeks until GDPR : How should valid consent be proven?

Stibbe - How should valid consent be proven?

Countdown 5 weeks until GDPR : How should valid consent be proven?

19.04.2018 EU law

Only 5 more weeks to go before the GDPR becomes fully effective. Preparing your company for the application of this new regulation requires a correct understanding of its principles. Each week, we highlight one particular misconception regarding the interpretation of the GDPR.

How should valid consent be proven?

Article 7 of the GDPR reads: “the controller shall be able to demonstrate that the data subject has consented to processing of his or her personal data”. However, the GDPR does not contain specific, compulsory provisions in relation to the conditions for proving how the consent was given or obtained.

In that respect, the GDPR is inconsistent with the provisions of certain previous national legislations implementing Directive 95/46/EC (such as, e.g., the Italian Legislative Decree no. 196 of June 30, 2003, whereby the data subject’s consent could be deemed to be effective only if it is “documented in writing”).  

As a consequence, data controllers have the right to demonstrate how the valid consent was obtained by using any means allowed under their legal systems. In that respect, the use of any means for keeping a record of the data subjects’ consent - such as, for example, written statements, also statements stored by electronic means, or tick boxes to be set on internet websites specifically addressing the consent to be sought for the envisaged data processing activities - could be recommended.

Stibbe, together with Chiomenti, Cuatrecasas, GIDE and Gleiss Lutz, have gathered this useful information, reflecting some common misconceptions about the implementation of the GDPR.

Team

Related news

04.05.2021 NL law
Participatie en privacyregels: hoe te combineren onder de Omgevingswet?

Short Reads - In het stelsel van de Omgevingswet (Ow) is een belangrijke rol bedacht voor participatie bij de totstandkoming van besluiten. Het beoogde resultaat: tijdig belangen, meningen en creativiteit op tafel krijgen en daarmee een groter draagvlak en kwalitatief betere besluitvorming bereiken. Door een grotere betrokkenheid van meer personen gaan overheden en initiatiefnemers ook meer persoonsgegevens verwerken. Dit brengt privacyrisico’s met zich mee. Wat regelt de Ow op het gebied van privacy, de verwerking van persoonsgegevens en datagebruik?

Read more

04.03.2021 BE law
Webinar: Responding to Personal Data Breaches in the Post-GDPR era

Seminar - On 24-26 March 2021 ERA (Adademy of European Law) organises an online Conference "Responding to Personal Data Breaches in the Post-GDPR era". Erik Valgaeren, our Brussels TMT partner, addresses the topic "Managing personal data breach in a complex international scenario", including cross border cases in the EU and breaches at non-EU establishments.

Read more

12.02.2021 EU law
After the Uber case and the Airbnb case … the Star Taxi App case: focus on the question of the qualification as “Information Society Service”

Articles - Societal and digital developments are reflected in the case law of the CJEU. For several years now, European judges resolve disputes relating to digital applications and the services they provide. On 3 December 2020, they handed down a judgment in a case concerning Star Taxi App. This blog analyses the Star Taxi App case law in the light of the Uber case law and the Airbnb case law. The three judgments have in common the question of the qualification of services as Information Society Services.  

Read more