Short Reads

ACM fines Dutch rail operator (NS) for an alleged abuse of dominance

ACM fines Dutch rail operator (NS) for an alleged abuse of dominance

ACM fines Dutch rail operator (NS) for an alleged abuse of dominance

03.07.2017 NL law

On 29 June 2017, the Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) published the non-confidential version of a decision imposing a fine of EUR 40.95 million on Dutch railway operator NS for an alleged abuse of dominance. The ACM closed its investigation into NS' former CEO and CFO, finding insufficient grounds to hold them personally liable for the alleged infringements (decision I, decision II).

The ACM found that NS abused its dominant position on the 'main railway network' in the Netherlands by committing two separate infringements in relation to a public transportation tender in Limburg in 2014. The winning bidder gained the right to provide all bus and train transportation services in Limburg for a period of 15 years.

The first infringement concerns a predatory pricing allegation. According to the ACM, NS' subsidiary Abellio submitted a "lossmaking bid" in the Limburg tender procedure. The ACM concluded that NS' expected costs (including the cost of capital) would exceed its expected revenue. As a result, the ACM found that its competitors "could not match or surpass NS’ bid without suffering losses themselves".

The second alleged infringement concerns a combination of various forms of conduct. The ACM found that NS (i) received confidential information from a former director of one of its competitors, (ii) delayed its response and provided incomplete information to its competitors when requesting access to NS' facilities in Limburg (e.g. at train stations), and (iii) passed on confidential information it received from competitors to its own subsidiary Abellio. The ACM concluded that these various forms of conduct, taken together, constituted an abuse.

According to the ACM, both infringements were aimed at preventing NS' competitors from "proving themselves in Limburg". According to the ACM, if a competitor had won the tender, this may have led to further decentralization of the main railway network, in which NS holds a dominant position.

NS – and its shareholder the Dutch Ministry of Finance – announced that it will appeal the decision.

This article was published in the Competition Law Newsletter of July 2017. Other articles in this newsletter:

  1. Google gets a record EUR 2.42 billion antitrust fine for its shopping service
  2. Recent European Commission merger decisions signal an increased focus on innovation
  3. New Belgian Act on damage claims for competition law infringements

Team

Related news

30.04.2019 EU law
Climate goals and energy targets: legal perspectives

Seminar - On Tuesday April 30th, Stibbe organizes a seminar on climate goals and energy targets. Climate change has incited different international and supranational institutions to issue climate goals and renewable energy targets. Both the UN and the EU have led this movement with various legal instruments.

Read more

04.04.2019 NL law
Tick-tock: no reset of the appeal clock for amending Commission decision

Short Reads - The European Court of Justice recently upheld the General Court's order finding that metal production and recycling company Eco-Bat had submitted its appeal outside of the appeal term. Eco-Bat had relied on the term starting from the date of the European Commission's decision correcting figures for the fine calculation in the initial infringement decision.

Read more

12.04.2019 NL law
Hoogste Europese rechter bevestigt dat overheden onrechtmatige staatssteun proactief moeten terugvorderen

Short Reads - De maand maart 2019 zal vermoedelijk de juridisch handboeken ingaan als een historische maand voor het mededingings- en staatssteunrecht. Niet alleen deed het Hof van Justitie een baanbrekende uitspraak op het gebied van het verhaal van kartelschade. Het heeft in de uitspraak Eesti Pagar (C-349/17) van 5 maart 2019 belangrijke vragen opgehelderd over de handhaving van het staatssteunrecht op nationaal niveau.

Read more

04.04.2019 NL law
Fine liability in antitrust cases is closely scrutinised by Dutch courts

Short Reads - A parent company can be held liable for a subsidiary's anti-competitive conduct if the parent has exercised decisive influence over the subsidiary, because the two are then considered a single undertaking. This is why the Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal (CBb) recently found that the ACM cannot simply rely on managing partners' civil liability to determine fine liability for a limited partnership's anti-competitive conduct.

Read more

10.04.2019 BE law
Acrylamide: zijn frieten ook juridisch schadelijk voor de gezondheid?

Articles - De risico’s door de aanwezigheid van acrylamide in levensmiddelen noopten de EU tot het nemen van risicobeperkende maatregelen. Exploitanten van levensmiddelenbedrijven van bepaalde levensmiddelen (o.a. frieten, chips, koekjes, …) kregen de verplichting om tal van maatregelen te nemen.  De juridische kwalificatie van acrylamide en het regime van deze maatregelen worden in deze blog toegelicht.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring