Short Reads

Belgian Competition Authority closes investigation into Most Favoured Nation clauses in Immoweb contracts

Belgian Competition Authority closes investigation into Most Favoured

Belgian Competition Authority closes investigation into Most Favoured Nation clauses in Immoweb contracts

05.12.2016 NL law

By a decision of 7 November 2016, the Belgian Competition Authority ("BCA") closed its investigation regarding Belgium’s leading real estate web portal Immoweb. The investigation concerned Most Favoured Nation ("MFN") clauses in contracts between Immoweb and developers of software for real estate agencies.

The developers of software for real estate agencies were paid by Immoweb for each real estate offer that was transferred through their software to the Immoweb portal. However, Immoweb inserted MNF clauses in its contracts with the software developers, which stated that the software developers also working with Immoweb’s competitors had to offer Immoweb the same conditions if these conditions were financially more advantageous than those concluded with Immoweb.
 
In its preliminary analysis, the BCA came to the conclusion that such clauses were restricting competition by raising the costs of Immoweb’s competitors. In response, Immoweb committed to unilaterally stop using MFN clauses and to refrain from incorporating MFN clauses in future contracts with software developers for a period of 5 years.
 
As a result of these commitments, the BCA decided to close the investigation. It did not take a position on whether Immoweb had violated competition rules by incorporating the abovementioned clauses in its contracts with software developers.
 
The decision confirms the approach adopted by the BCA in the Distri-One v. Coca-Cola and Banksys cases that commitments can lead to the end of an investigation. The BCA also follows other decisions in Europe regarding MFN clauses, such as in the Booking.com case, where the French, Swedish and Italian Authorities accepted commitments and closed their investigation. In Germany, however, the Bundeskartellamt rejected the commitments offered by Booking.com, considering they were insufficient to reverse the collusive impact of the contested MFN clauses.

This article was published in the Competition Law Newsletter of December 2016. Other articles in this newsletter:

1. European Commission publishes study on the passing-on of overcharges 

2. Legislative Proposal introducing class actions in the Netherlands before House of Representatives 

Team

Related news

07.02.2019 NL law
The ACM follows EU approach in its first pharmaceutical merger

Short Reads - The Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) recently reviewed its first merger between two pharmaceutical companies. In its conditional clearance of Aurobindo's acquisition of certain European Apotex assets, the ACM followed the European Commission's approach in assessing the merger's impact on competition. Companies will welcome the news that pharma mergers will be reviewed in a similar fashion, irrespective of whether the ACM or the European Commission conducts the review.

Read more

07.02.2019 EU law
Digitisation and competition law: past, present and future

Short Reads - It is nearly time for the European Commission to reveal its course of action in digitisation and competition law. Feedback from a public consultation and the recent conference on 'Shaping competition policy in the era of digitisation' together with the upcoming expert panel's report on the future challenges of digitisation for competition policy are likely to shape the Commission's course of action.

Read more

07.02.2019 NL law
Follow-on cartel damages claim dismissed: don't bury courts under paper work

Short Reads - A recent ruling by the Dutch Court of Appeal confirmed that claimants will need to sufficiently substantiate their claim that they suffered loss due to a cartel, even in follow-on cases. Despite a presumption that sales or service contracts concluded during the cartel period have been affected by the cartel, claimants will still need to provide the courts with concrete, detailed and uncluttered information showing (i) which party purchased (ii) which products from (iii) which manufacturer for (iv) which amount, preferably with copies of the relevant agreements.

Read more

07.02.2019 NL law
The need for speed in mergers is no reason to ignore rights of defence

Short Reads - On 16 January 2019, the European Court of Justice clarified the procedural guarantees the European Commission needs to provide to merging parties during merger reviews. According to the Court of Justice, the General Court (GC) had rightly annulled the Commission's decision to prohibit the merger of UPS and TNT. UPS's right of defence had been infringed because the Commission had failed to share the final version of the econometric model with UPS before adopting its prohibition decision.

Read more

28.01.2019 LU law
The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg implements the Register of Beneficial Owners Law

Articles - The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has fulfilled its European obligations in the fight against money laundering and the financing of terrorism by transposing Directive 2015/849 of 20 May 2015 (also known as the 4th EU AML Directive) into national law with the brand new Law of 13 January 2019 (the RBE Law). Below is an overview of the important disclosure obligations that will soon apply to a wide range of Luxembourg entities.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring