Short Reads

Belgian Competition Authority closes investigation into Most Favoured Nation clauses in Immoweb contracts

Belgian Competition Authority closes investigation into Most Favoured

Belgian Competition Authority closes investigation into Most Favoured Nation clauses in Immoweb contracts

05.12.2016 NL law

By a decision of 7 November 2016, the Belgian Competition Authority ("BCA") closed its investigation regarding Belgium’s leading real estate web portal Immoweb. The investigation concerned Most Favoured Nation ("MFN") clauses in contracts between Immoweb and developers of software for real estate agencies.

The developers of software for real estate agencies were paid by Immoweb for each real estate offer that was transferred through their software to the Immoweb portal. However, Immoweb inserted MNF clauses in its contracts with the software developers, which stated that the software developers also working with Immoweb’s competitors had to offer Immoweb the same conditions if these conditions were financially more advantageous than those concluded with Immoweb.
 
In its preliminary analysis, the BCA came to the conclusion that such clauses were restricting competition by raising the costs of Immoweb’s competitors. In response, Immoweb committed to unilaterally stop using MFN clauses and to refrain from incorporating MFN clauses in future contracts with software developers for a period of 5 years.
 
As a result of these commitments, the BCA decided to close the investigation. It did not take a position on whether Immoweb had violated competition rules by incorporating the abovementioned clauses in its contracts with software developers.
 
The decision confirms the approach adopted by the BCA in the Distri-One v. Coca-Cola and Banksys cases that commitments can lead to the end of an investigation. The BCA also follows other decisions in Europe regarding MFN clauses, such as in the Booking.com case, where the French, Swedish and Italian Authorities accepted commitments and closed their investigation. In Germany, however, the Bundeskartellamt rejected the commitments offered by Booking.com, considering they were insufficient to reverse the collusive impact of the contested MFN clauses.

This article was published in the Competition Law Newsletter of December 2016. Other articles in this newsletter:

1. European Commission publishes study on the passing-on of overcharges 

2. Legislative Proposal introducing class actions in the Netherlands before House of Representatives 

Team

Related news

10.10.2018 NL law
Ongevraagd advies Raad van State: normering van geautomatiseerde overheidsbesluitvorming

Short Reads - Op 31 augustus 2018 heeft de Afdeling advisering van de Raad van State (hierna: "Afdeling advisering") een 'Ongevraagd advies over de effecten van de digitalisering voor de rechtsstatelijke verhoudingen' betreffende de positie en de bescherming van de burger tegen een "iOverheid" uitgebracht. Het gebeurt niet vaak dat de Afdeling advisering zo een ongevraagd advies uitbrengt. Dit onderstreept het belang van de voortdurend in ontwikkeling zijnde technologie en digitalisering in relatie tot de verhouding tussen de overheid en de maatschappij.

Read more

01.10.2018 EU law
UK Court upholds fine against Ping for online sales ban

Short Reads - On 7 September 2018, the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) upheld the UK Competition and Market Authority's (CMA) decision fining Ping Europe Limited, a manufacturer of golf clubs, for violating EU and UK competition law by prohibiting two UK retailers from selling Ping golf clubs online. While the CAT reduced the fine from £1.45 million to £1.25 million, it confirmed that outright online sales bans in the context of selective distribution agreements are restrictive of competition by object.

Read more

01.10.2018 EU law
Court of Justice refers case against Infineon in relation to smart card chips cartel back to the General Court

Short Reads - On 26 September 2018, the European Court of Justice partially set aside the judgment of the General Court in the smart card chips cartel case. Infineon had argued that the General Court wrongfully assessed only five out of eleven allegedly unlawful contacts. The Court agreed with Infineon insofar as its argument related to the amount of the fine imposed. Philips had also appealed the General Court judgment but that appeal was dismissed in its entirety meaning that the Court of Justice upheld the European Commission's decision and fine.

Read more

01.10.2018 EU law
Dutch Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal annuls mail market analysis decision

Short Reads - On 3 September 2018, the Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal (CBb) annulled the market analysis decision regarding 24-hour business mail issued by the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) on 27 July 2017. In appeal proceedings filed by PostNL, the CBb ruled that the ACM had failed to demonstrate that digital mail was not part of the relevant market for 24-hour business mail.

Read more

26.09.2018 EU law
Algemene bepalingen inzake oneerlijke handelspraktijken wijken voor specifiekere regelgeving

Articles - In geval van strijdigheid tussen de Richtlijn Oneerlijke Handelspraktijken[1] (en bij uitbreiding de omzettingsbepalingen in Boek VI WER) en andere Europeesrechtelijke voorschriften betreffende specifieke aspecten van oneerlijke handelspraktijken, hebben deze laatste voorrang (zie artikel 3, lid 4 van de Richtlijn Oneerlijke Handelspraktijken). Dat dit tot interessante discussies kan leiden, bleek uit een recent arrest van het Hof van Justitie[2].

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring