Short Reads

Belgian Competition Authority closes investigation into Most Favoured Nation clauses in Immoweb contracts

Belgian Competition Authority closes investigation into Most Favoured

Belgian Competition Authority closes investigation into Most Favoured Nation clauses in Immoweb contracts

05.12.2016 NL law

By a decision of 7 November 2016, the Belgian Competition Authority ("BCA") closed its investigation regarding Belgium’s leading real estate web portal Immoweb. The investigation concerned Most Favoured Nation ("MFN") clauses in contracts between Immoweb and developers of software for real estate agencies.

The developers of software for real estate agencies were paid by Immoweb for each real estate offer that was transferred through their software to the Immoweb portal. However, Immoweb inserted MNF clauses in its contracts with the software developers, which stated that the software developers also working with Immoweb’s competitors had to offer Immoweb the same conditions if these conditions were financially more advantageous than those concluded with Immoweb.
 
In its preliminary analysis, the BCA came to the conclusion that such clauses were restricting competition by raising the costs of Immoweb’s competitors. In response, Immoweb committed to unilaterally stop using MFN clauses and to refrain from incorporating MFN clauses in future contracts with software developers for a period of 5 years.
 
As a result of these commitments, the BCA decided to close the investigation. It did not take a position on whether Immoweb had violated competition rules by incorporating the abovementioned clauses in its contracts with software developers.
 
The decision confirms the approach adopted by the BCA in the Distri-One v. Coca-Cola and Banksys cases that commitments can lead to the end of an investigation. The BCA also follows other decisions in Europe regarding MFN clauses, such as in the Booking.com case, where the French, Swedish and Italian Authorities accepted commitments and closed their investigation. In Germany, however, the Bundeskartellamt rejected the commitments offered by Booking.com, considering they were insufficient to reverse the collusive impact of the contested MFN clauses.

This article was published in the Competition Law Newsletter of December 2016. Other articles in this newsletter:

1. European Commission publishes study on the passing-on of overcharges 

2. Legislative Proposal introducing class actions in the Netherlands before House of Representatives 

Team

Related news

30.04.2019 EU law
Climate goals and energy targets: legal perspectives

Seminar - On Tuesday April 30th, Stibbe organizes a seminar on climate goals and energy targets. Climate change has incited different international and supranational institutions to issue climate goals and renewable energy targets. Both the UN and the EU have led this movement with various legal instruments.

Read more

04.04.2019 NL law
Tick-tock: no reset of the appeal clock for amending Commission decision

Short Reads - The European Court of Justice recently upheld the General Court's order finding that metal production and recycling company Eco-Bat had submitted its appeal outside of the appeal term. Eco-Bat had relied on the term starting from the date of the European Commission's decision correcting figures for the fine calculation in the initial infringement decision.

Read more

12.04.2019 NL law
Hoogste Europese rechter bevestigt dat overheden onrechtmatige staatssteun proactief moeten terugvorderen

Short Reads - De maand maart 2019 zal vermoedelijk de juridisch handboeken ingaan als een historische maand voor het mededingings- en staatssteunrecht. Niet alleen deed het Hof van Justitie een baanbrekende uitspraak op het gebied van het verhaal van kartelschade. Het heeft in de uitspraak Eesti Pagar (C-349/17) van 5 maart 2019 belangrijke vragen opgehelderd over de handhaving van het staatssteunrecht op nationaal niveau.

Read more

04.04.2019 NL law
Fine liability in antitrust cases is closely scrutinised by Dutch courts

Short Reads - A parent company can be held liable for a subsidiary's anti-competitive conduct if the parent has exercised decisive influence over the subsidiary, because the two are then considered a single undertaking. This is why the Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal (CBb) recently found that the ACM cannot simply rely on managing partners' civil liability to determine fine liability for a limited partnership's anti-competitive conduct.

Read more

10.04.2019 BE law
Acrylamide: zijn frieten ook juridisch schadelijk voor de gezondheid?

Articles - De risico’s door de aanwezigheid van acrylamide in levensmiddelen noopten de EU tot het nemen van risicobeperkende maatregelen. Exploitanten van levensmiddelenbedrijven van bepaalde levensmiddelen (o.a. frieten, chips, koekjes, …) kregen de verplichting om tal van maatregelen te nemen.  De juridische kwalificatie van acrylamide en het regime van deze maatregelen worden in deze blog toegelicht.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring