Short Reads

Entitlement of the pledgee to enforce security attached to a receivable of the pledgor

Entitlement of the pledgee to enforce security attached to a receivable of the pledgor

Entitlement of the pledgee to enforce security attached to a receivable of the pledgor

14.04.2016 NL law

 

The Dutch Supreme Court has recently provided a ruling confirming the entitlement of the pledgee to enforce security attached to a receivable pledged to it.

 

The Dutch Supreme Court 18 December 2015 (ECLI:NL:HR:2015:3619)

This ruling addresses a question which is of great relevance to the Dutch finance practice: is the holder of a disclosed right of pledge over a receivable entitled to enforce a right of pledge over other receivables which was created as security for the receivable pledged to it? The Supreme Court ruled that in such a case, the entitlement of the pledgee to collect the receivable pledged to it also comprises the entitlement to enforce the security rights attached to that receivable. According to the Advocate General at the Supreme Court, although the above question has been widely answered affirmatively in legal literature, the ruling has provided welcome confirmation.

In this case, Marell had created a right of pledge over certain receivables owed to it by its debtors for the benefit of Pegas. Pegas had created a right of pledge over certain receivables owed to it by its debtors (including Marell) for the benefit of its financing bank. The bank had informed certain debtors of Marell that they could only discharge the receivables owed by them to Marell by making payment to the bank. Marell initiated interim relief proceedings against the bank, claiming that the bank must inform Marell's debtors that they can only discharge the receivables owed by them to Marell by making payment to Marell.

The question before the Supreme Court was whether the bank was entitled to collect the receivables owed by Marell's debtors to Marell which were subject to the right of pledge created by Marell for the benefit of Pegas. Previously, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal had ruled that the bank was precluded from collecting the receivables owed by Marell's debtors to Marell on the basis that repledging (herverpanding) is prohibited according to section 3:242 Dutch Civil Code, which sets out that a pledgee is not entitled to repledge the property pledged to him, unless this power has been unequivocally granted to him.

In view of the bank's entitlement to collect the receivables pledged to it, the Supreme Court ruled that the bank was also entitled to enforce any rights of pledge created over receivables owed by debtors of the pledgor to the pledgor as security for the receivables pledged to the bank. In practice, after having informed the debtors of the pledgor of the rights of pledge created over the receivables owed by those debtors to the pledgor, the bank was entitled to collect such receivables up to the amount of the receivables owed to it by the pledgor.

The Supreme Court succinctly dealt with the approach of the Court of Appeal regarding the prohibition on repledging and ruled that such prohibition relates to situations in which a pledgee conducts an act of disposition (beschikkingshandeling) in respect of property pledged to it by creating a right of pledge over such property. According to the Supreme Court, no such situation applies in the dispute between Marell and the bank. Pegas had not created a right of pledge over the receivables pledged to it by Marell. Instead Pegas had created a right of pledge over receivables owed to it by its debtors, including Marell. A right of pledge (created by Marell over certain receivables owed to Marell by Marell's debtors) was indeed attached to the receivables owed by Marell to Pegas, but this is not the same as the creation of a right of repledge (herverpanding) by Pegas over receivables owed to Marell by Marell's debtors which were pledged to Pegas.

This judgment is relevant for the Dutch finance practice because it further removes uncertainty about the status of rights of pledge on secured receivables. If a pledgee is entitled to enforce its right of pledge on receivables, it is also entitled to enforce security attached to such receivables.

 

Related news

17.01.2020 LU law
Stibbe boosts service offering in Luxembourg with new partners and counsel for asset management/funds and corporate & finance

Inside Stibbe - Luxembourg, 17 January 2020 – Stibbe reinforces its corporate & finance and asset management/funds practices in Luxembourg with the hire of Bernard Beerens (corporate partner), Audrey Jarreton (banking and finance counsel), Edouard d’Anterroches (investment funds partner), Victorien Hémery (investment funds partner), and Dayana Bert (investment funds counsel). Their arrival comes after the recent hire of tax partner Johan Léonard. All of these new additions demonstrate the firm’s commitment to expanding Stibbe’s service offering in Luxembourg.

Read more

15.01.2020 NL law
The Dutch scheme - a summary of the upcoming new restructuring tool

Short Reads - As mentioned in our earlier blog, the Dutch legislator has prepared a bill – the Act on confirmation of private restructuring plans (Wet homologatie onderhands akkoord) – introducing a framework that allows debtors to restructure their debts outside formal insolvency proceedings (the “Dutch Scheme“). We expect this highly-anticipated bill to enter into force by this summer. The Dutch Scheme combines features from the UK Scheme of Arrangement and the US Chapter 11 proceedings. Below, we summarize certain key aspects of the Dutch Scheme.

Read more

17.01.2020 LU law
Stibbe Luxembourg étend son offre de services par la venue de nouveaux associés et counsels au sein des pratiques spécialisées en gestion d’actifs/fonds d’investissement, en droit des sociétés ainsi qu’en droit financier

Inside Stibbe - Luxembourg, le 17 janvier 2020 – Stibbe renforce ses pratiques spécialisées en droit des sociétés, en droit financier ainsi qu’en gestion d’actifs/fonds d’investissement par la venue de Bernard Beerens (associé, droit des sociétés), Audrey Jarreton (counsel, droit bancaire et financier), Edouard d’Anterroches (associé, fonds d’investissement), Victorien Hémery (associé, fonds d’investissement) et Dayana Bert (counsel, fonds d’investissement).

Read more

15.01.2020 NL law
Consultatiereactie 'Wet plan van aanpak witwassen'

Short Reads - Soeradj Ramsanjhal, Karlijn van den Heuvel, Djoe Kuils, Rogier Raas, Judica Krikke en Muriël Rosing hebben een reactie ingediend op het concept wetsvoorstel ‘Wet plan van aanpak witwassen’. Dit wetsvoorstel is 2 december 2019 in consultatie gegaan en bevat verschillende voorgestelde wijzigingen van de Wet ter voorkoming van witwassen en financieren van terrorisme en de Wet op de economische delicten. 

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring