Articles

New Dutch Arbitration Act

New Dutch Arbitration Act

New Dutch Arbitration Act

23.01.2015 NL law

On 1 January 2015 the New Dutch Arbitration Act entered into force. Aside from updating the arbitration law, this legislation aims to strengthen the position of the Netherlands as an important (international) arbitration country, for instance, by taking into account the Uncitral Model Law on International Arbitration of the United Nation. 

The Act provides that an arbitration clause in general terms and conditions falls into the so called 'black list' of unreasonable clauses in consumer agreements. For this reason, parties should consider amending  arbitration clauses in their general terms and conditions as soon as possible.

The Act provides a statutory framework for E-Arbitration, including correspondence and arbitral awards by email. Furthermore, the arbitration proceedings are simplified in some circumstances and certain costs are no longer applicable. The requirement of filing the arbitral award has been abandoned and the proceedings for annulment of an arbitral award are reduced to proceedings in one factual instance, before the Court of Appeal. However, the possibility of cassation remains.

The Act also provides that an arbitration clause included in the general terms and conditions will be placed on the so called 'black list'. If such an arbitration clause is invoked by the company that uses the general terms vis-a-vis a consumer, this is considered unreasonable and hence it can be annulled, unless the general terms and conditions provide that the consumer can choose to go to a regular court for the settlement of the dispute within a period of at least one month after the company invokes the clause. To avoid annulment it is not sufficient that such a period is in fact granted; it should be specifically included in the general terms and conditions. Parties that have an arbitration clause in their general terms and conditions should consider making an amendment to this effect as soon as possible.

The revised Act applies to arbitrations that are brought before the tribunal on or after 1 January 2015. The old rules apply to cases that have been brought before the tribunal before this date.

Team

Related news

25.06.2019 LU law
The dawn of a new era of cross-border mobility within the EU?

Seminar - François Bernard, Senior Associate at Stibbe Luxembourg, will conduct a seminar in Luxembourg on 25 June in collaboration with Legitech on Directive proposal COM2018 (241 final) amending the cross-border merger regime currently enshrined in Directive (EU) 2017/1132 and introducing a new regime applicable to cross-border conversions and divisions.

Read more

03.06.2019 NL law
Toerekening van kennis van groepsvennootschappen

Articles - In de praktijk doet zich vaak de vraag voor of kennis die aanwezig is binnen de ene vennootschap kan worden toegerekend aan een andere vennootschap binnen hetzelfde concern. In dit artikel verkent Branda Katan zowel de dogmatische grondslag als de praktische toepassing van een dergelijke toerekening. Zij concludeert dat het ‘Babbel-criterium’ (heeft in de gegeven omstandigheden de kennis X in het maatschappelijk verkeer te gelden als kennis van Y?) geschikt is voor het toerekenen van kennis in concernverband.

Read more

28.05.2019 NL law
Dutch court: insufficient substantiation? No follow-on cartel damages action

Short Reads - Dutch courts are forcing claimants (including claims vehicles) to be well-prepared before initiating follow-on actions. The Amsterdam District Court in the Dutch trucks cartel follow-on proceedings recently ruled that claimants – specifically CDC, STCC, Chapelton, K&D c.s. and STEF c.s. – had insufficiently substantiated their claims. These claimants now have until 18 September 2019 to provide sufficient facts regarding transactions that – according to them – were affected by the cartel. Preparation should thus be key for cartel damages actions.

Read more

04.06.2019 NL law
Dutch Supreme Court clarifies evidentiary rules concerning signatures and signed documents

Short Reads - In two recent decisions, the Dutch Supreme Court has clarified the evidentiary power of signed documents. If the signatory unambiguously denies that the signature on the document is his or hers or claims that another party has tampered with the signature (for instance, through forgery or copying a signature from one document and pasting it in another), it is up to the party invoking the signed document to prove the signature's authenticity (ECLI:NL:HR:2019:572).

Read more

24.05.2019 NL law
European regulatory initiatives for online platforms and search engines

Short Reads - As part of the digital economy, the rise of online platforms and search engines raises all kinds of legal questions. For example, do bicycle couriers qualify as employees who are entitled to ordinary labour law protections? Or should they be considered self-employed (see our Stibbe website on this issue)? The rise of online platforms also triggers more general legal questions on the relationship between online platforms and their users. Importantly, the European Union is becoming increasingly active in this field.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring