Articles

New Dutch Arbitration Act

New Dutch Arbitration Act

New Dutch Arbitration Act

23.01.2015 NL law

On 1 January 2015 the New Dutch Arbitration Act entered into force. Aside from updating the arbitration law, this legislation aims to strengthen the position of the Netherlands as an important (international) arbitration country, for instance, by taking into account the Uncitral Model Law on International Arbitration of the United Nation. 

The Act provides that an arbitration clause in general terms and conditions falls into the so called 'black list' of unreasonable clauses in consumer agreements. For this reason, parties should consider amending  arbitration clauses in their general terms and conditions as soon as possible.

The Act provides a statutory framework for E-Arbitration, including correspondence and arbitral awards by email. Furthermore, the arbitration proceedings are simplified in some circumstances and certain costs are no longer applicable. The requirement of filing the arbitral award has been abandoned and the proceedings for annulment of an arbitral award are reduced to proceedings in one factual instance, before the Court of Appeal. However, the possibility of cassation remains.

The Act also provides that an arbitration clause included in the general terms and conditions will be placed on the so called 'black list'. If such an arbitration clause is invoked by the company that uses the general terms vis-a-vis a consumer, this is considered unreasonable and hence it can be annulled, unless the general terms and conditions provide that the consumer can choose to go to a regular court for the settlement of the dispute within a period of at least one month after the company invokes the clause. To avoid annulment it is not sufficient that such a period is in fact granted; it should be specifically included in the general terms and conditions. Parties that have an arbitration clause in their general terms and conditions should consider making an amendment to this effect as soon as possible.

The revised Act applies to arbitrations that are brought before the tribunal on or after 1 January 2015. The old rules apply to cases that have been brought before the tribunal before this date.

Team

Related news

11.04.2019 NL law
The Dutch UBO register will be introduced in January 2020

Short Reads - On 4 April 2019, a legislative proposal to implement the Dutch Ultimate Beneficial Owner (''UBO'') register (''UBO register'') was submitted to the Dutch parliament. The obligation to introduce a UBO register derives from the Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive as amended by the Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive. Approximately 1.5 million Dutch legal entities must register information on their UBOs in this register.

Read more

08.04.2019 NL law
Stibbe lanceert webtool over implementatie aandeelhoudersrechtenrichtlijn

Short Reads - Op 2 april 2019 heeft de Tweede Kamer het wetsvoorstel ter implementatie van de Herziene aandeelhoudersrechtenrichtlijn (EU) 2017/828 aangenomen. Hierbij zijn ook diverse Amendementen aangenomen in de eerder voorgestelde regeling rondom het bezoldigingsbeleid en het bezoldigingsverslag. Om u te informeren over de implementatie van de Herziene aandeelhoudersrechtenrichtlijn in Nederland hebben wij een webtool gelanceerd over dit onderwerp.

Read more

11.04.2019 NL law
Double roles in attributing knowledge

Short Reads - The knowledge of a person who in fact runs a company can be attributed to the company if the sole director and shareholder is a 'straw man', the Supreme Court confirmed in a judgment of 29 March 2019. The rules by the Supreme Court are not revolutionary or even new. But circumstances essential for the attribution of knowledge are ignored. The double role played by the 'man in charge' raises questions about how to apply the rules as identified by the Supreme Court to the facts

Read more

05.04.2019 NL law
Wetsvoorstel implementatie Herziene aandeelhoudersrechtenrichtlijn aangenomen door de Tweede Kamer

Short Reads - Op 2 april 2019 heeft de Tweede Kamer het wetsvoorstel ter implementatie van de Herziene aandeelhoudersrechtenrichtlijn (EU) 2017/828 aangenomen. Hierbij zijn ook diverse Amendementen aangenomen in de eerder voorgestelde regeling rondom het bezoldigingsbeleid en het bezoldigingsverslag.

Read more

10.04.2019 NL law
Damage due to a defective driveway and the Dutch twenty year limitation period: When does limitation start in case of a continuous event that causes damage?

Short Reads - On 22 March 2019, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled (ECLI:NL:HR:2019:412) that the strict liability for buildings (opstalaansprakelijkheid) is not linked to a specific damaging act but to a damaging condition, as referred to in section 6:174 DCC. Therefore, there is no reason to regard a damaging act as an 'event that caused damage' as referred to in section 3:310 DCC concerning the limitation period for claims for damages.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring