Articles

Proposal to amend the Shareholder Rights Directive

Proposal to amend the Shareholder Rights Directive

Proposal to amend the Shareholder Rights Directive

08.07.2014 NL law

 

On 9 April 2014, the European Commission (‘EC’) published a proposal (COM 2014/213) to amend the Shareholder Rights Directive (2007/36/EU). With this proposal, the EC aims to enhance effective and long-term shareholder engagement within listed companies. Furthermore, it is envisaged that listed companies will benefit from identifiable shareholders that are engaged and use their voting rights in a well-informed manner. 

The key elements of the proposal are:

  • Identification of shareholders, transmission of information with shareholders, and facilitation of the exercise of shareholder rights

Intermediaries will be required to offer listed companies the option to identify their shareholders. Furthermore, listed companies will be required to provide intermediaries with standardized information aimed at the shareholders in a timely manner. Also, the listed companies will be required to confirm the votes cast in general meetings by or on behalf of shareholders.

  • Transparency and shareholder engagement of institutional investors

Through the use of several transparency requirements, institutional investors and asset managers will be encouraged to exercise an equity investment strategy aligned with the medium to long-term performance of their assets. They will need to comply with a number of requirements such as preparing and disclosing a shareholder engagement policy. This engagement policy should relate to the exercise of supervisory and voting rights, the conduct of a dialogue with the company, the use of proxy advisors, and how to manage actual or potential conflicts of interest.

  • Improving reliability, transparency and quality of proxy advisors’ recommendations

The preparation and quality of the voting recommendations of proxy advisors will be audited. Proxy advisors will be required to publicly disclose certain key information related to the preparation of their voting recommendations on an annual basis, specifying whether and how they engaged in a dialogue with the company in preparing the recommendation.

  • Influence of the general meeting on the remuneration policy for managing directors

The general meeting will be authorised to vote on the remuneration policy for the managing directors. This already exists in the Netherlands. A new element is that the remuneration policy should be submitted to the general meeting for approval every three years. Listed companies must prepare a remuneration report with an overview of the remuneration awarded to each individual managing director. The general meeting is authorised to vote on the report annually. The Dutch government has already indicated that it supports the increase of the general meeting’s influence on the remuneration policy for managing directors, but noted that it does not consider it appropriate for the general meeting to also vote on the execution of the remuneration policy.

  • Improving transparency and influence of shareholders on related party transactions

Shareholder approval will be required for significant transactions with related parties. Significant transactions are those that either represent more than 5% of a company’s assets or potentially have a significant impact on a company’s turnover or profits. All related party transactions with a value of more than 1% of the company’s assets, must be disclosed at the time the transaction concludes. Such disclosure must be accompanied by a statement from an independent expert (the ‘fairness opinion’) providing insight into the conditions of the transaction. At present, the Dutch government considers – without further explanation – the proposals disproportionate given that it is not certain whether related party transactions pose a problem.

For more information we refer to our Corporate Update of 8 May 2014.

 

Team

Related news

18.02.2019 EU law
Erik Valgaeren moderates a panel on Data Governance and Compliance during IBA's Silicon Beach Conference

Speaking slot - The discussion topic will cover various legal aspects relating to data lifecycle management, both for personal and non personal data. These aspects will include rights in and obligations regarding data, such retention obligations and portability rights. Practical suggestions on holistic data management and the role of the chief data officer will be debated.

Read more

07.02.2019 NL law
The ACM follows EU approach in its first pharmaceutical merger

Short Reads - The Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) recently reviewed its first merger between two pharmaceutical companies. In its conditional clearance of Aurobindo's acquisition of certain European Apotex assets, the ACM followed the European Commission's approach in assessing the merger's impact on competition. Companies will welcome the news that pharma mergers will be reviewed in a similar fashion, irrespective of whether the ACM or the European Commission conducts the review.

Read more

18.02.2019 NL law
Brexit and data protection: preparing for a 'no-deal'

Short Reads - As it stands, the UK will exit the European Union at midnight on 29 March 2019. Therefore, businesses within the UK, or with trade relations with the UK, would be best advised to assume that a no-deal Brexit is inevitable. The exchange of personal data  within the EU is governed by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In a no-deal Brexit, the GDPR will cease to be applicable in the UK upon its EU exit.

Read more

07.02.2019 NL law
Follow-on cartel damages claim dismissed: don't bury courts under paper work

Short Reads - A recent ruling by the Dutch Court of Appeal confirmed that claimants will need to sufficiently substantiate their claim that they suffered loss due to a cartel, even in follow-on cases. Despite a presumption that sales or service contracts concluded during the cartel period have been affected by the cartel, claimants will still need to provide the courts with concrete, detailed and uncluttered information showing (i) which party purchased (ii) which products from (iii) which manufacturer for (iv) which amount, preferably with copies of the relevant agreements.

Read more

07.02.2019 NL law
The need for speed in mergers is no reason to ignore rights of defence

Short Reads - On 16 January 2019, the European Court of Justice clarified the procedural guarantees the European Commission needs to provide to merging parties during merger reviews. According to the Court of Justice, the General Court (GC) had rightly annulled the Commission's decision to prohibit the merger of UPS and TNT. UPS's right of defence had been infringed because the Commission had failed to share the final version of the econometric model with UPS before adopting its prohibition decision.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring