Articles

Proposal to amend the Shareholder Rights Directive

Proposal to amend the Shareholder Rights Directive

Proposal to amend the Shareholder Rights Directive

08.07.2014 NL law

On 9 April 2014, the European Commission (‘EC’) published a proposal (COM 2014/213) to amend the Shareholder Rights Directive (2007/36/EU).

On 9 April 2014, the European Commission (‘EC’) published a proposal (COM 2014/213) to amend the Shareholder Rights Directive (2007/36/EU). With this proposal, the EC aims to enhance effective and long-term shareholder engagement within listed companies. Furthermore, it is envisaged that listed companies will benefit from identifiable shareholders that are engaged and use their voting rights in a well-informed manner. 

The key elements of the proposal are:

  • Identification of shareholders, transmission of information with shareholders, and facilitation of the exercise of shareholder rights

Intermediaries will be required to offer listed companies the option to identify their shareholders. Furthermore, listed companies will be required to provide intermediaries with standardized information aimed at the shareholders in a timely manner. Also, the listed companies will be required to confirm the votes cast in general meetings by or on behalf of shareholders.

  • Transparency and shareholder engagement of institutional investors

Through the use of several transparency requirements, institutional investors and asset managers will be encouraged to exercise an equity investment strategy aligned with the medium to long-term performance of their assets. They will need to comply with a number of requirements such as preparing and disclosing a shareholder engagement policy. This engagement policy should relate to the exercise of supervisory and voting rights, the conduct of a dialogue with the company, the use of proxy advisors, and how to manage actual or potential conflicts of interest.

  • Improving reliability, transparency and quality of proxy advisors’ recommendations

The preparation and quality of the voting recommendations of proxy advisors will be audited. Proxy advisors will be required to publicly disclose certain key information related to the preparation of their voting recommendations on an annual basis, specifying whether and how they engaged in a dialogue with the company in preparing the recommendation.

  • Influence of the general meeting on the remuneration policy for managing directors

The general meeting will be authorised to vote on the remuneration policy for the managing directors. This already exists in the Netherlands. A new element is that the remuneration policy should be submitted to the general meeting for approval every three years. Listed companies must prepare a remuneration report with an overview of the remuneration awarded to each individual managing director. The general meeting is authorised to vote on the report annually. The Dutch government has already indicated that it supports the increase of the general meeting’s influence on the remuneration policy for managing directors, but noted that it does not consider it appropriate for the general meeting to also vote on the execution of the remuneration policy.

  • Improving transparency and influence of shareholders on related party transactions

Shareholder approval will be required for significant transactions with related parties. Significant transactions are those that either represent more than 5% of a company’s assets or potentially have a significant impact on a company’s turnover or profits. All related party transactions with a value of more than 1% of the company’s assets, must be disclosed at the time the transaction concludes. Such disclosure must be accompanied by a statement from an independent expert (the ‘fairness opinion’) providing insight into the conditions of the transaction. At present, the Dutch government considers – without further explanation – the proposals disproportionate given that it is not certain whether related party transactions pose a problem.

For more information we refer to our Corporate Update of 8 May 2014.

 

Team

Related news

08.08.2019 BE law
Regulating online platforms: piece of the puzzle

Articles - The new Regulation no. 2019/1150 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online intermediation services, applicable as of 12 July 2020, is another piece of the puzzle regulating online platforms, this time focussing on the supply side of the platforms.

Read more

01.08.2019 NL law
General court dismisses all five appeals in the optical disk drives cartel

Short Reads - The General Court recently upheld a Commission decision finding that suppliers of optical disk drives colluded in bids for sales to Dell and HP by engaging in a network of parallel bilateral contacts over a multi-year period. The General Court rejected applicants' arguments regarding the Commission's fining methodology, including that the Commission ought to have provided reasons for not departing from the general methodology set out in its 2006 Guidelines.

Read more

02.08.2019 NL law
De insidermelding onder de Verordening Marktmisbruik met betrekking tot afgeleide en verbonden financiële instrumenten

Articles - Soeradj Ramsanjhal schreef samen Jeevan Sathie een artikel over de insidermelding bij beursvennootschappen. Deze meldplicht is niet altijd snel te doorgronden, met name als transacties betrekking hebben op afgeleide of verbonden financiële instrumenten. Ten aanzien hiervan is een 20%-drempel opgenomen en een uitzondering van de meldplicht met betrekking tot deelnemingsrechten in discretionair beheerde beleggingsinstellingen.

Read more

01.08.2019 NL law
Brand owners beware: Commission tough on cross-border sales restrictions

Short Reads - The European Commission recently imposed a EUR 6.2 million fine on Hello Kitty owner Sanrio for preventing its licensees from selling licensed merchandising products across the entire EEA. Sanrio is the second licensor (after Nike) to be fined for imposing territorial sales restrictions on its non-exclusive licensees for licensed merchandise. A third investigation into allegedly similar practices by Universal Studios is ongoing. The case confirms the Commission's determination to tackle these practices, regardless of type or form.

Read more

Our website uses functional cookies for the functioning of the website and analytic cookies that enable us to generate aggregated visitor data. We also use other cookies, such as third party tracking cookies - please indicate whether you agree to the use of these other cookies:

Privacy – en cookieverklaring