Articles

Proposal to amend the Shareholder Rights Directive

Proposal to amend the Shareholder Rights Directive

Proposal to amend the Shareholder Rights Directive

08.07.2014 NL law

 

On 9 April 2014, the European Commission (‘EC’) published a proposal (COM 2014/213) to amend the Shareholder Rights Directive (2007/36/EU). With this proposal, the EC aims to enhance effective and long-term shareholder engagement within listed companies. Furthermore, it is envisaged that listed companies will benefit from identifiable shareholders that are engaged and use their voting rights in a well-informed manner. 

The key elements of the proposal are:

  • Identification of shareholders, transmission of information with shareholders, and facilitation of the exercise of shareholder rights

Intermediaries will be required to offer listed companies the option to identify their shareholders. Furthermore, listed companies will be required to provide intermediaries with standardized information aimed at the shareholders in a timely manner. Also, the listed companies will be required to confirm the votes cast in general meetings by or on behalf of shareholders.

  • Transparency and shareholder engagement of institutional investors

Through the use of several transparency requirements, institutional investors and asset managers will be encouraged to exercise an equity investment strategy aligned with the medium to long-term performance of their assets. They will need to comply with a number of requirements such as preparing and disclosing a shareholder engagement policy. This engagement policy should relate to the exercise of supervisory and voting rights, the conduct of a dialogue with the company, the use of proxy advisors, and how to manage actual or potential conflicts of interest.

  • Improving reliability, transparency and quality of proxy advisors’ recommendations

The preparation and quality of the voting recommendations of proxy advisors will be audited. Proxy advisors will be required to publicly disclose certain key information related to the preparation of their voting recommendations on an annual basis, specifying whether and how they engaged in a dialogue with the company in preparing the recommendation.

  • Influence of the general meeting on the remuneration policy for managing directors

The general meeting will be authorised to vote on the remuneration policy for the managing directors. This already exists in the Netherlands. A new element is that the remuneration policy should be submitted to the general meeting for approval every three years. Listed companies must prepare a remuneration report with an overview of the remuneration awarded to each individual managing director. The general meeting is authorised to vote on the report annually. The Dutch government has already indicated that it supports the increase of the general meeting’s influence on the remuneration policy for managing directors, but noted that it does not consider it appropriate for the general meeting to also vote on the execution of the remuneration policy.

  • Improving transparency and influence of shareholders on related party transactions

Shareholder approval will be required for significant transactions with related parties. Significant transactions are those that either represent more than 5% of a company’s assets or potentially have a significant impact on a company’s turnover or profits. All related party transactions with a value of more than 1% of the company’s assets, must be disclosed at the time the transaction concludes. Such disclosure must be accompanied by a statement from an independent expert (the ‘fairness opinion’) providing insight into the conditions of the transaction. At present, the Dutch government considers – without further explanation – the proposals disproportionate given that it is not certain whether related party transactions pose a problem.

For more information we refer to our Corporate Update of 8 May 2014.

 

Team

Related news

07.08.2018 NL law
Legislative proposal to protect trade secrets: update

Short Reads - On 5 July 2016, the EU Trade Secrets Directive came into effect (Directive 2016/943/EU). The directive intends to harmonise rules regarding the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) across all EU member states. As the directive is not directly applicable in the member states, each member state must enact national implementing legislation.

Read more

07.08.2018 NL law
Boskalis v. Fugro: scope of a shareholder's right to put items on the agenda

Short Reads - Under Dutch law (section 114a of book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code), shareholders have the right to put items on the agenda of the general meeting. The question arises as to whether shareholders also have the right to force an (informal) vote in the general meeting on subjects which are not within their powers. A judgment of the Dutch Supreme Court of 20 April 2018 between Boskalis and Fugro focused on this question.

Read more

07.08.2018 NL law
General Data Protection Regulation comes into effect

Short Reads - On 25 May 2018, the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into effect. The GDPR replaces the EU's prior directive governing the processing and transfer of personal data, which was in place since 1995. As a regulation, the GDPR is directly applicable in all 28 EU member states and thus removes the need for national implementing legislation. However, the GDPR allows member states discretion in certain areas, as a result of which national legislation may still be implemented. In the Netherlands, the GDPR Implementation Act came into effect on 25 May 2018.

Read more

01.08.2018 EU law
Belgian Court of Cassation annuls decision prohibiting pharmacists from using Google Adwords

Short Reads - On 7 June 2018, the Belgian Court of Cassation, ruled that a decision of the Pharmacists Association Appeals Council (Appeals Council) prohibiting pharmacists from using Google Adwords to offer over-the-counter (OTC) products violated Belgian competition law because the Appeals Council did not sufficiently justify why such a prohibition was necessary for health reasons. The Appeals Council must now issue a new decision.

Read more

07.08.2018 NL law
Protection of listed companies against unsolicited takeovers, prevention of unwanted influences in the telecoms sector and protection of other vital sectors: latest developments

Short Reads - Following a recent series of (attempted) unsolicited takeovers by foreign bidders of Dutch listed companies, such as PostNL, Unilever and AkzoNobel, the protection of companies against unsolicited takeovers and the protection of vital sectors have received more attention in both the Netherlands and Europe.

Read more

01.08.2018 EU law
General Court underlines importance of Commission's duty to state reasons

Short Reads - On 13 July 2018, the General Court annulled the EUR 1.13 million fine imposed on Stührk Delikatessen Import GmbH & Co. KG (Stührk) by the European Commission in 2013 for Stührk's participation in the shrimp cartel. The Court ruled that the Commission had failed to adequately state reasons in the contested decision as to why the cartel participants were granted divergent fine reductions.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring