Articles

Royal Decree introduces mandatory Collective Action Clauses for issues of Belgian Sovereign Notes

Royal Decree introduces mandatory Collective Action Clauses for issues of Belgian Sovereign Notes

Royal Decree introduces mandatory Collective Action Clauses for issues of Belgian Sovereign Notes

26.02.2013 BE law

This Finance e-bulletin briefly outlines the CACs’ scope of application and their quorum and approval thresholds. Procedural rules with regard to bondholders meeting and its possible adjournment are not dealt with.

1. Introduction

On Friday 21 February 2013, the Belgian Official Gazette published a Royal Decree introducing mandatory Collective Action Clauses for issues of Belgian “bons d’Etat/Staatsbons” (hereafter referred to asBelgian Sovereign Notes). The Royal Decree of 17 February 2013 amending the Royal Decree of 9 July 2000 regarding the issue of Sovereign Notes (“Arrêté royal modifiant l’arrêté royal du 9 juillet 2000relatif à l’émission des bons d’Etat”/ “Koninklijk besluit tot wijziging van het koninklijk besluit van 9 juli 2000 betreffende de uitgifte vanStaatsbons” or the Royal Decree) partly1 implements the Collective Action Clause requirement as imposed by Article 12, Paragraph 3 of the recently modified Treaty Establishing the European Stability Mechanism (ESM Treaty).2 

 

Collective Action Clauses (“clauses collective d’action”/“collectieve-actie clausules” or CACs) essentially incorporate into the terms and conditions of (sovereign) bonds a binding mechanism to facilitate amendments to the terms and conditions of a particular bond issue during its term. CACs’ thus introduce for sovereign bonds a similar mechanism as is typically incorporated in private sector bond issues to allow an issuer to achieve after the date of issue amendments of the terms by obtaining the consent of a majority of the bondholders in a way that is legally binding upon all bondholders of the same issue.3 

 

For private sector bonds such variation mechanism is based on express provisions on bondholder meetings contained in the Belgian Companies Code (articles 568 - 580) combined with tailor made contractual provisions set out in the issue documentation. For Belgian Sovereign Notes, the Royal Decree now provides for the mandatory inclusion by operation of such decree of standard CACs into the terms and conditions of such bonds. 

 

The CACs’ content, is described in detail in the Annex to the Royal Decree refers (“Annexe àl’arrêté royal modifiant l’arrêté royal du 9 juillet 2000 relatif à l’émissiondes bons d’Etat”/ “Bijlage bij het koninklijk besluit tot wijziging van hetkoninklijk besluit van 9 juli 2000 betreffende de uitgifte vanStaatsbons” or Royal Decree Annex). 

 

2. Scope of application 

 

 

2.1  Limited to Belgian Sovereign Notes 

 

Belgian Sovereign Notes may only be acquired by retail investors (“particuliers”/“particulieren) as defined in Article 3 of the Royal Decree of 9 July 2000 regarding the issuance of Belgian Sovereign Notes (theRoyal Decree of July 2000). 

 

2.2  No specification as to relevant maturity 

 

The ESM Treaty only requires the inclusion of CACs for govern ment securities with maturity above one year. The Royal Decree does not stipulate any minimum duration, but in practice Belgian Sovereign Notes typically mature after three, five or eight years.  

 

2 .3  Sovereign Notes’ issued as from 1 January 2013

 

The Royal Decree provides for the inclusion of CACs, as of 1 January 2013, in all issues of Belgian Sovereign Notes.4 The practical consequences of the Royal Decree’s retroactive application (prompted by the European standardisation5) are limited. Belgian Sovereign Notes are in principle issued only in March, June, September and December.6 Note that the Royal Decree applies to the on-going March 4 issue of Sovereign notes. 

 

3. Quorum and approval thresholds 

 

 

The Belgian State can convoke a meeting of bondholders at will.7 Itshould however convoke a meeting of bondholders in case of persisting default8 (“défaut persistante”/“wanprestatie welkevoortduurt”) when at least 10% by principle amount of bondholders in writing requires a meeting of bondholders to be held.9 To determine which quorum and approval thresholds suffice to legally bind all bondholders by a modification of the Sovereign notes’ terms10; one has to take into account the criteria discussed below. 

 

-          The Quorum and Approval thresholds of the CACs first vary depending on the nature of the modification. The Royal Decree Annex introduces two distinct types of modification: 

 

  • Reserved Matter Modifications; and 
  • Non Reserved Matter Modifications. - Different quorums and approval thresholds apply for both categories. Within each category, single (“modifications quiconcerne une seule ligne”/“wijzigingen die betrekkinghebben op een enkele lijn”) vs. cross-series modifications (“modifications qui concerne plusieurs lignes”/“wijzigingen diebetrekking hebben op verscheidene lijnen”) should further be distinguished.11 

 

-          The Quorum and Approval thresholds could finally defer depending on whether the modification is agreed by a meeting of bondholders or a written procedure (“résolutionécrite”/ “geschreven resolutie”). Note that the correction of manifest errors (“erreurmanifeste”/“duidelijke vergissingen”) and/or technical amendments (“modifications techniques” / “technische wijzigingen”) does not require the bondholders’ approval.12 

 

A calculation agent (“agent de calcul”/“berekeningsagent”) shall be designated by the sovereign issuer to determine whether the quorum and approval thresholds are in place for a valid modification.13 On this matter and for further procedural rules with regard to bondholders meeting and its possible adjournment), we refer to the Royal Decree Annex. 

 

3.1  Reserved Matter Modification 

 


Modifications with regard to a “Reserved Matter” (“Matière reservée” / “Voorbehouden kwestie”) (RMM) require compliance with strict quorum and approval thresholds. Reserved Matters indeed involve the amendment of one of the Belgian Sovereign Notes’ essential terms and conditions. These include, but are not limited to14

 

  • a change of the  date on which any amount is payable under the note ; 
  • a reduction of any amount payable under the  note; 
  • the modification of the calculation of any amount payable under the note; 
  • the modification of the currency or place for payment of any amount payable under the note; 
  • the introduction of an additional condition for  payments under the note or which in any other way modifies the payment obligations of the issuer; and vi)    modifications with regard to the ranking or seniority of the note; 
  • the amendment of the definition of RMM. 

 

In order to reach a quorum (“quorum”/ “quorum”), a RMM requires at least two thirds (66, 66 %) by principal amount of the bond holders to be present.15 Important is that aforementioned quorum also applies to an adjourned meeting.16 

 

A distinct approval threshold (“majorité exigée”/ “vereistemeerderheid”) for a RMM applies with regard to a single and cross series modification of bonds: 

 

  • A RMM for single series of bonds requires approval of the Belgian State and of 75% by principle amount of all bonds represented at a quorate meeting.17 A written procedure RMM requires approval of the Belgian State and of 66, 66 % by principle amount of bondholders.18 
  • In addition to approval of the Belgian State and of 75% by principle amount of all bonds represented at a quorate meeting, a RMM across series of bonds requires 66, 66 % by principle amount of bondholders of each individual series represented at a quorate meeting.19 

 

A written procedure RMM across series of bonds requires approval of the Belgian State and of 66, 66 % by principle amount of bondholders plus 50 % of the principle amount of all outstanding bonds of each series.20 

 

3.2  Non Reserved Matter Modification (NRMM) 

 

Modifications with regard to a “Non Reserved Matter” (“Matière non-reservée” /“Niet voorbehouden kwestie”) (NRMM) require a less stringent quorum and approval threshold. Neither the Royal Decree nor the Royal Decree Annex defines what constitutes a “Non ReservedMatter”. One could however safely assume that every modification which does not imply a RMM is to be qualified as a NRMM.

 

In order to reach a quorum, a NRMM requires at least one in two by principal amount of the bond holders to be present at the meeting.21 An adjourned meeting is quorate if 25% by principal amount is present.22 A quorate meeting could approve the NRMM by at least 50 % by principal amount of all bonds represented at the meeting.23

 

 

Footnotes

 

  1. Note that the Royal Decree’s scope of application (essentially the fact that its scope is confined to Sovereign notes) does not correspond with the ESM Treaty that provides for CACs for all “new euro government area securities”.  In the absence of a further Royal Decree, CACs will need to be included on a case to case base in the bond documentation for issues outside the Royal Decree’s scope of application in order to comply with the ESM Treaty. 
  2. Treaty Establishing the European Stability Mechanism between the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and the Republic of Finland, OJ L 91, 6.4.2011, p. 1. 
  3. See Article 4.12  Royal Decree Annex. 
  4. Note that the CAC requirement applies irrespective the emission’s governing law. 
  5. Cf. Official memorandum (“Rapport au Roi”/ “Verslag aan de Koning”) on article 2 of the Royal Decree. 
  6. See in this regard article 4 Royal Decree of July 2000. 
  7. See Article 4.2 (a) Royal Decree Annex. 
  8. For what constitutes a default: see Article 1 (j) Royal Decree Annex. 
  9. See Article 4.2 (b) Royal Decree Annex. 
  10. On what constitutes a ‘modification’: see Article 1 (e) Royal Decree Annex. 
  11. On the notions “ligne”/“lijn” and “modifications portant sur plusieurslignes”/“wijzigingen over lijnen”: see Article 1 (c) and (f) Royal Decree Annex.
  12. See Article 6 Royal Decree Annex. 
  13. See Article 3 Royal Decree Annex. 
  14. For an overview, see Article 1 (g) Royal Decree Annex. 
  15. See Article 4.5 a). Royal Decree Annex. 
  16. See Article 4.6 a). Royal Decree Annex. 
  17. See Article 2.1. a) Royal Decree Annex. 
  18. See Article 2.1. b) Royal Decree Annex. 
  19. See Article 2.2.a) (i) and b) (i) Royal Decree Annex. 
  20. See Article 2.2. a) (ii) and b) (ii)  Royal Decree Annex. 
  21. See Article 4.5 b) Royal Decree Annex. 
  22. See Article 4.6 b) Royal Decree Annex. 
  23. See 2.5. Royal Decree Annex. 

 

All rights reserved. Care has been taken to ensure that the content of this e-bulletin is as accurate as possible. However the accuracy and completeness of the information in this e-bulletin, largely based upon third party sources, cannot be guaranteed. The materials contained in this e-bulletin have been prepared and provided by Stibbe for information purposes only. They do not constitute legal or other professional advice and readers should not act upon the information contained in this e-bulletin without consulting legal counsel. Consultation of this e-bulletin will not create an attorney-client relationship between Stibbe and the reader. The e-bulletin may be used only for personal use and all other uses are prohibited.

 

 

Team

Related news

23.07.2018 NL law
Evaluatie Wbfo en start consultatie over mogelijke wijzigingen/wettelijke maatregelen voor vaste beloning

Short Reads - Op 17 juli 2018 heeft de minister van Financiën de twee rapporten over de evaluatie van de Wet beloningsbeleid financiële ondernemingen (Wbfo) aangeboden aan de Tweede Kamer. Tevens is een maatschappelijke consultatie naar drie wettelijke maatregelen met betrekking tot de vaste beloningen geopend.

Read more

16.07.2018 NL law
ISDA publishes consultation on benchmark fallbacks

Short Reads - ISDA publishes consultation on benchmark fallbacks. As part of an initiative to amend its standard derivatives documentation to facilitate the replacement of existing interbank offered rates (IBORs) by risk free rates (RFRs), the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) has published a consultation paper on certain adjustments required to such RFRs.

Read more

10.07.2018 EU law
Hof van Justitie EU oordeelt over reikwijdte 'beroepsgeheim' financiële toezichthouders voor bedrijfsgegevens

Articles - In een arrest van 19 juni 2018 oordeelt de Grote kamer van het Hof van Justitie EU over de reikwijdte van het 'beroepsgeheim' van financiële toezichthouders voor bedrijfsgegevens. Het hof oordeelt dat de informatie die zich in het toezichtsdossier bevindt niet onvoorwaardelijk vertrouwelijk van aard is en bijgevolg onder het beroepsgeheim van de toezichthouder valt. Gegevens die mogelijk commerciële geheimen zijn geweest, worden in beginsel geacht niet meer actueel en dus niet langer geheim te zijn, wanneer die gegevens ten minste vijf jaar oud zijn.

Read more

11.07.2018 NL law
Update initiatiefwetsvoorstel introductie instemmingsrecht en aanscherping vaste beloning bankiers

Short Reads - Op 25 april 2018 heeft de Afdeling advisering van de Raad van State (hierna Raad van State) een kritisch advies uitgebracht over het initiatief-wetsvoorstel om de wet op het financieel toezicht (Wft) te wijzigen. Op 5 juli 2018 is dit advies tezamen met de reactie van de initiatiefnemers van het wetsvoorstel op het advies van de Raad van State gepubliceerd, evenals het aangepaste wetsvoorstel dat is aangeboden aan de Tweede Kamer.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring