Articles

New Dutch "Authority for Consumers and Markets" becomes operational

New Dutch "Authority for Consumers and Markets" becomes operational

New Dutch "Authority for Consumers and Markets" becomes operational

02.04.2013

From 1 April 2013 a new enforcement authority is active in the Netherlands: the Authority for Consumers and Markets ("ACM"). The ACM is the result of a merger between the Netherlands Competition Authority (Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit), the Independent Post and Telecommunications Authority (Onafhankelijke Post en Telecommunicatie Autoriteit) and the Netherlands Consumer Authority (Consumentenautoriteit). Other governmental enforcement authorities like the Dutch Healthcare Authority (Nederlandse Zorgautoriteit) and the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financiële Markten) will continue to operate independently of the ACM.

On 26 February 2013, the Dutch Senate passed a bill that established the ACM (Instellingswet). The ACM has assumed the powers and tasks of the previously independent enforcement authorities and it is led by a board of three members presided by Chris Fonteijn, the former Chairman of the Dutch Competition Authority and the Independent Post and Telecommunications Authority. The ACM will focus on three main themes: consumer protection, sector-specific regulation and competition oversight.

The ACM consists of seven directorates, the most relevant of which are the Directorate Competition (Directie Mededinging); the Directorate Energy (Directie Energie); the Directorate Telecommunications, Transport and Postal Services (Directie Telecom, Vervoer en Post); the Directorate Consumers (Directie Consumenten); and the Directorate Sanctions and Legal Affairs (Directie Sancties en Juridische Zaken). Noteworthy is that competition law enforcement on the energy markets is assumed by the Directorate Energy, while the energy market for consumers falls under the supervision of the Directorate Consumers. The Directorate Sanctions and Legal Affairs will be entrusted with the imposition of sanction decisions within the sphere of all Directorates.

The formal establishment of the ACM does not yet entail any changes as to the application of the Dutch Competition Act. Changes in and harmonization of the procedures and powers of the different divisions of the ACM will be brought about by separate legislation (Stroomlijningswet). It is envisioned that this additional legislation will enter into force on 1 January 2014 but it still has to go through the entire legislative process.

For now, the powers and procedures of the enforcement authorities will remain essentially the same. There is one exception. The ACM from now on possesses the power to issue binding instructions and impose fines up to €450.000 for infringements previously enforced by the Netherlands Consumer Authority. Previously, the Netherlands Consumer Authority could only issue fines up to €450.000 in cases concerning unfair trade practices. The maximum fine that could be imposed for all other infringements within its area of competence was €78.000. The Instellingswet sets a uniform maximum fine of €450.000 for all infringements that were previously enforced by the Netherlands Consumer Authority.

On 11 April 2013, the ACM will hold a press conference in which it will present its enforcement policies in more detail. In the meantime information about the ACM is available on its website www.acm.nl.

Team

Related news

18.02.2019 NL law
Brexit and data protection: preparing for a 'no-deal'

Short Reads - As it stands, the UK will exit the European Union at midnight on 29 March 2019. Therefore, businesses within the UK, or with trade relations with the UK, would be best advised to assume that a no-deal Brexit is inevitable. The exchange of personal data  within the EU is governed by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In a no-deal Brexit, the GDPR will cease to be applicable in the UK upon its EU exit.

Read more

07.02.2019 NL law
The ACM follows EU approach in its first pharmaceutical merger

Short Reads - The Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) recently reviewed its first merger between two pharmaceutical companies. In its conditional clearance of Aurobindo's acquisition of certain European Apotex assets, the ACM followed the European Commission's approach in assessing the merger's impact on competition. Companies will welcome the news that pharma mergers will be reviewed in a similar fashion, irrespective of whether the ACM or the European Commission conducts the review.

Read more

13.02.2019 BE law
Deadline for UBO information filing postponed (again)

Articles - The Belgian Minister of Finance has announced that the 31 March 2019 deadline for filing the UBO information regarding Belgian companies, non-profit associations, foundations, trusts, fiduciaries, and similar legal entity structures will be postponed.

Read more

07.02.2019 NL law
Follow-on cartel damages claim dismissed: don't bury courts under paper work

Short Reads - A recent ruling by the Dutch Court of Appeal confirmed that claimants will need to sufficiently substantiate their claim that they suffered loss due to a cartel, even in follow-on cases. Despite a presumption that sales or service contracts concluded during the cartel period have been affected by the cartel, claimants will still need to provide the courts with concrete, detailed and uncluttered information showing (i) which party purchased (ii) which products from (iii) which manufacturer for (iv) which amount, preferably with copies of the relevant agreements.

Read more

13.02.2019 EU law
Our TMT team examines the interaction between GDPR and other key legal domains during a seminar 'GDPR 360°'

Seminar - Erik Valgaeren, Partner TMT, and his team organize a seminar which focuses on the interaction between GDPR and litigation, corporate law, administrative law and employment law.

Read more

07.02.2019 NL law
The need for speed in mergers is no reason to ignore rights of defence

Short Reads - On 16 January 2019, the European Court of Justice clarified the procedural guarantees the European Commission needs to provide to merging parties during merger reviews. According to the Court of Justice, the General Court (GC) had rightly annulled the Commission's decision to prohibit the merger of UPS and TNT. UPS's right of defence had been infringed because the Commission had failed to share the final version of the econometric model with UPS before adopting its prohibition decision.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring