Flemish Government approves Technical Regulations Distribution Gas and Electricity

Flemish Government approves Technical Regulations Distribution Gas and Electricity

Flemish Government approves Technical Regulations Distribution Gas and Electricity

19.11.2012 BE law

Novelties in the VREG’s amended Technical Regulations Distribution Gas and Electricity concern closed distribution grids, congestion management, flexible connections, and the injection ofbiomethane in the natural gas distribution grid. The Flemish Orders approving these Regulations were recently published in the Official Journal. However, one could question the competence of the Flemish Government in approving these Regulations.

On 15 May 2012 the VREG, the Flemish Energy Market Regulator, adopted new Technical Regulations for the Distribution of Gas and Electricity1. The Flemish Government approved these regulations by issuing two orders, which were published recently in the Official Journal2.

The Technical Regulations were amended to further implement the third Energy Package. The terminology used in these Regulations also conformed to that of the Energy Decree.

The most significant amendments concern:

1. Closed Distribution Grids

The Energy Decree covers the construction and exploitation of closed distribution grids (chapter VI). The Technical Regulations supplement these provisions with technical prescriptions. According to these prescriptions, operators of closed distribution grids enjoy certain freedom when they lay down for example, procedures, terms in model contracts and forms for the operation of the closed distribution grids. However, these documents should be disclosed, e.g., to the ARP or the VREG, whenever these authorities request for them (Art. I.6.1.4). Furthermore, the concerning DSO will remain competent to adopt a Connection Regulation. 
The Technical Regulations also introduce two new notions: Downstream Access Point (Achterliggend Toegangspunt) and Coupling Points (‘Koppelpunten’)3
The first one, Downstream Access Point, is the access point for producers or consumers from the closed distribution grid. This notion was introduced so that it could be clearly distinguished from access points to public grids.  
The second notion, Coupling Points, refers to points where closed distribution grids and the public distribution grid are connected to each other. This notion is used to distinguish from Connection Points. According to the VREG the notion is inspired by the coupling models that exist among DSOs, or between a DSO and a TSO. Coupling Points would theoretically be the most pure term because closed distribution grids are rather a form of distribution grids a connected grid user4
However, the Technical Regulations specify clearly that installations behind different access points may not be connected to each other without explicit permission from the DSO (Art. III.5.1.3). Similarly, the Technical Regulation Distribution Electricity also prohibits installations from being produced behind different coupling points (Art. III.8.1.5).

2. Congestion Management

The Technical Regulation Distribution Electricity sets out a modified congestion management. All requests for connection and the corresponding capacity reservations should be treated in the order requested (first-come, first-served), but the electricity DSO should give priority to CHP or renewable energy installations (Art. III.3.3.24). Capacity reservations will only be valid for a period of 2 years. Capacity reservations are neither marketable nor transferable (Art. III.3.3.31). 

3. “Flexible connections” :

are also formalized, despite opposition by FEBEG, the Federation of Belgian Electricity and Gas Companies5. Flexible connections are connections for which the producer would agree not to inject electricity if, at anytime, the grid were to be saturated. The Technical Regulation Distribution Electricity states that the electricity DSO may decide to allow for an “abnormal” connection, depending on the characteristics of the local electricity distribution grid or if the installation of the grid user causes harmful interferences or excessive voltage fluctuations (Art. III.3.1.3). Furthermore, for projects with a global production capacity of 1000 kVA or more, or for projects where a temporary limitation of the production would be necessary in n-1 situations, the DSO may impose limitations on the production based on objective criteria, if exceptional exploitation circumstances require it and provided that these limitations have been embedded in a contract (art. III.4.4.2). 

4. Injection of Biomethane

Although no injection points currently exist on the distribution grid in Flanders, the Technical Regulation Distribution Gas allows for the possibility to inject biomethane in the natural gas distribution grids. The injection is, however, limited to the middle pressure grids of categories B and C. The operator of the coupled grid can demand that the biomethane fulfill certain conditions, e.g., regarding the composition of the gas.

Other amendments to the Technical Regulations concern improvements in certain processes and provisions regarding the introduction of smart metering.

However, it should be noted that the Flemish Government’s approval of the Technical Regulations might not conform with European law. According to Art. 41(6) of the third Gas Directive and Art. 37(6) of the third Electricity Directive, the regulator is competent for fixing or approving the terms and conditions for the connection and access to national networks and the provision of balancing services, for example. In the parliamentary preparations regarding the implementation of the third Energy Package at the federal level, the Council of State noted that a provision allowing the King to lay down the federal Technical Regulations would violate European legislation6. The Flemish Technical Regulations were drafted by the VREG and only approved by the Flemish Government, according to Art. 4.2.1 §3 of the Energy Decree. Nevertheless, one may wonder whether such approval, even without any amendments, conforms with European law, since such approval is not theoretically necessary for the Technical Regulations to enter into force.


  1. According to art. 4.2.1 of the Energy Decree 
  2. Order of the Flemish Government of 25 May 2012 regarding theapproval of the technical regulation distribution gas, Official Journal 14 November 2012; Order of the Flemish Governmentof 25 May 2012 regarding the approval of the technicalregulation distribution electricity, Official Journal 14 November 2012
  3. Cf. terminology of Art. 4.6.2 Energy Decree. 
  4. Cf. Parl. St. Vl. Parl. 2010-11, nr. 1147/1, pp. 39–40. 
  5. PowerPoint-presentation of FEBEG of 11 April 2012, “Congestion Management by distribution”.  FEBEG argued that flexible connections would discourage grid investments and investments in generation capacity, and that they constitute discrimination between existing and new connections. 
  6. Parl. St. Kamer 2011-12, nr. 1725/1, p. 281

All rights reserved. Care has been taken to ensure that the content of this e-bulletin is as accurate as possible. However the accuracy and completeness of the information in this e-bulletin, largely based upon third party sources, cannot be guaranteed. The materials contained in this e-bulletin have been prepared and provided by Stibbe for information purposes only. They do not constitute legal or other professional advice and readers should not act upon the information contained in this e-bulletin without consulting legal counsel. Consultation of this e-bulletin will not create an attorney-client relationship between Stibbe and the reader. The e-bulletin may be used only for personal use and all other uses are prohibited.



Related news

17.08.2018 BE law
Overstromingen en vergunningen: hoe zit het nu juist?

Articles - Met de vaststelling van de zogenaamde watergevoelige openruimtegebieden (ook wel de "WORG") hoopt de Vlaamse regering een nieuwe stap te zetten richting in haar overstromingsbeleid. En hoe beter een grond tegen overstromingen beschermen dan er een (relatief) bouwverbod op te voorzien. Maar is het vooropgestelde bouwverbod in deze WORG wel een aardverschuiving? In deze post vergelijken we drie watergerelateerde instrumenten waarmee het vergunningverlenend bestuur rekening moet houden.   

Read more

08.08.2018 BE law
Modification du contenu de la notice d'évaluation et de l’étude d’incidences en Région wallonne

Articles - Un décret du 24 mai 2018 modifie sur plusieurs points le régime de l'évaluation des incidences des projets sur l'environnement en droit wallon. Ce décret allège, d’une part, le contenu de la notice d'évaluation des incidences sur l'environnement et renforce, d’autre part, le contenu de l'étude d'incidences. Il est applicable aux demandes de permis introduites depuis le 16 juin 2018.

Read more

23.07.2018 NL law
De gewijzigde Klimaatwet; wat staat er in?

Short Reads - Op 27 juni 2018 is een gewijzigd voorstel voor de Klimaatwet gepresenteerd aan de Tweede Kamer (zie hier). In eerdere blogberichten bespraken wij de verhouding tussen de Klimaatwet en het Klimaatakkoord (zie hier) en het oorspronkelijke initiatiefwetsvoorstel van Klaver en Samsom in 2016 (zie hier).

Read more

27.07.2018 NL law
Conclusie AG programma aanpak stikstof: het PAS als instrument is veelbelovend, maar twijfel of het voldoet aan de Habitatrichtlijn. De ADC-toets als creatieve oplossing om het PAS in stand te kunnen houden?

Articles - Advocaat-Generaal ("AG") Kokott heeft op 25 juli 2018 een conclusie genomen over de vragen van de Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak over het programma aanpak stikstof. Een dergelijk programma kan op zichzelf voldoen aan de Habitatrichtlijn. Knelpunt ziet de AG in het vooruitlopen op de positieve effecten van te treffen reductiemaatregelen. Verder geeft de AG als handreiking mee gebruik te maken van de zogeheten ADC-toets.

Read more

19.07.2018 BE law
Ontsporing van één van de wagons van de Codextrein dreigt: Grondwettelijk Hof schorst nieuwe afwijkingsmogelijkheid voor ontginningsgebieden

Articles - De Codextrein voorziet o.a. in een reeks aan nieuwe afwijkingsmogelijkheden in het kader van de vergunningverlening. Eén van de meest ophefmakende was de nieuwe afwijkingsmogelijkheid voor ontginningsgebieden. Tijdens het debat in de parlementaire commissie werd geopperd dat deze nieuwe afwijking op maat was geschreven van één private onderneming. Het Grondwettelijk Hof schorst nu in zijn arrest van 19 juli 2018 deze afwijkingsmogelijkheid op basis van de schending van het gelijkheidsbeginsel.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring