Articles

Bonus Prohibition Bill-Update

Bonus Prohibition Bill-Update

Bonus Prohibition Bill-Update

17.02.2012 NL law

1.  Bonus Prohibition Bill - Update

On Tuesday 14 February 2012, the Lower House (Tweede Kamer) adopted the Bill on the limitation of liability of the DNB and the AFM and the introduction of a bonus prohibition for State supported institutions, including several amendments.

Current status
The modified Bill in which the adopted amendments have been incorporated will now be sent to the Senate (Eerste Kamer). The date on which the Bill will enter into force is not yet known, but this is expected to happen shortly.

Key changes to the Bill
On 6 and 7 February 2012, six amendments have been discussed in the Lower House. As a result of the adoption of the amendments the Bill now has a wider scope. Please click here to view the modified Bill including the explanatory notes to the amendments.
 
Managing directors or policymakers
One amendment extended the scope of the Bill to persons who determine the day-to-day policy (dagelijks beleidsbepalers) of the financial institution instead of limiting it to formal board members (bestuurders) only. This amendment however only applies to financial institutions that received or will receive state support after 7 February 2012. For financial institutions that received state support prior to this date the prohibition only applies to 'managing directors' instead of 'policy makers'.

State participations
The scope of the bonus prohibition is also extended to financial institutions that do not receive state support within the meaning of section 107 of the EU Treaty, but which are directly or indirectly held by the Dutch State.

20 percent increase
Discussions have taken place on the question whether a one-time increase of the fixed salary of managing directors should be allowed. The Bill now provides for a possibility of a maximum increase of the fixed salary of 20 percent on an individual basis during the period as from 26 October 2011 up to the date the Bill becomes law, provided that this increase is subject to all other restrictions that may apply with respect to executive compensation. During the debate, the Minister has mentioned that the maximum increase is appropriate and fits in the context of the Bill.

We also refer to our December alert in relation to the extension of the scope of the Bill to Dutch subsidiaries of foreign financial institutions that have received state support within the meaning of section 107 of the EU Treaty.

For more information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Obviously, we shall keep you posted of any relevant developments.

Team

Related news

02.07.2020 NL law
European Commission to pull the strings of foreign subsidies

Short Reads - The European Commission is adding powers to its toolbox to ensure a level playing field between European and foreign(-backed) companies active on the EU market. On top of merger control and Foreign Direct Investment screening obligations, companies may also need to account for future rules allowing scrutiny of subsidies granted by non-EU governments if those subsidies might distort the EU Single Market.

Read more

04.06.2020 NL law
Please share – ACM conditionally clears shared mobility platform merger

Short Reads - There may soon be a new competition tool available to tackle structural competition concerns in dynamic tech and platform markets. Until then, competition authorities resort to existing tools to deal with these markets. The Dutch competition authority (ACM) recently subjected the merger of two emerging platforms – without significant market footprint – to behavioural remedies. On 20 May 2020, the ACM cleared the merger between the travel apps of Dutch rail operator NS and transport company Pon.

Read more

02.07.2020 NL law
New competition tool: something old, something new, something borrowed

Short Reads - Large online platforms may face more regulatory obligations, whilst non-dominant companies’ unilateral conduct may soon be curbed. The European Commission intends to tool up its kit by adding a new regulation to keep digital gatekeepers in check, as well as providing more clarity on how to define digital markets in its new Market Definition Notice.

Read more

04.06.2020 NL law
No proof of competitive disadvantage? No abusive favouritism

Short Reads - Companies claiming abuse of dominance in civil proceedings have their work cut out for them, as demonstrated by a ruling of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. Real estate association VBO had accused dominant online platform Funda of favouritism. However, in line with the District Court’s earlier ruling, the Appeal Court dismissed the claim for insufficient evidence of negative effects on competition. The ruling confirms that the effect-based approach also applies in civil abuse claims, and that the standard of proof is high.    

Read more