Short Reads

KEI pilot ends: reset of digital litigation at Dutch courts, and new procedural rules

KEI pilot ends: reset of digital litigation at Dutch courts, and new

KEI pilot ends: reset of digital litigation at Dutch courts, and new procedural rules

05.08.2019 NL law

On 1 October 2019, legislation will enter into force ending the KEI pilot scheme for digital litigation at the courts of Gelderland and Central Netherlands (Midden-Nederland). However, certain new procedural rules, which were part of the digitalisation pilot, will remain in force and will apply to all Dutch courts.

End of digital litigation

The pilot for digital litigation started on 1 September 2017 for claims with mandatory legal representation at the courts of Gelderland and Central Netherlands; see our previous blogs 'KEI: Digitalization of the justice system', 'The start of KEI: introduction of digital litigation' and 'Implementation of KEI legislation for Civil 1.0 procedures'. The pilot was originally supposed to be integrated in several phases, and digital litigation was planned to be integrated in all Dutch courts in 2019. This was cancelled, however, after the development of the digital system had been aborted due to budget overruns and uncertainty about whether it would result in a well-functioning system. The operation of the pilot scheme had led to differences in litigation and procedural rules at the courts of Gelderland and central Netherlands on one hand, and the rest of the Dutch courts on the other, since 1 September 2017.

The need to align the procedural rules for all Dutch courts as soon as possible has resulted in this new legislation, which puts an end to the pilot and provides for the same procedural rules for all Dutch courts.

The digital litigation for claims in cassation, in force since 1 March 2017, will remain unchanged.

Reset of digitalisation

The Council of the Judiciary has now adopted a  basic plan for civil law and administrative law to shape digitalisation in a different way (dubbed the "reset" of digitalisation) as a first step towards future legislation on digital litigation. This will require the same uniform procedural law to apply to all courts. Therefore, adjustments are needed to the procedural regulations. These are currently being worked on.

Introducing new procedural rules

The new legislation does not only withdraw the digitalisation pilot, but also introduces new procedural rules that aim to provide the judge with more control during the case and introduce more flexibility and options during an oral hearing. These rules already applied to the two district courts that were involved in the pilot, but as of 1 October 2019 they will apply to all Dutch district courts and courts of appeal. The new rules include the following:

  • The judge can order an oral hearing during any stage of the proceedings. The parties will always have the opportunity to further clarify their arguments during an oral hearing. Therefore the right for a plea (pleidooi) being a separate procedural action comes to an end;
  • During an oral hearing, the judge can discuss the course of the proceedings with the parties, and can order the parties to conduct additional procedural actions. This way judges will have more control, allowing for more customisation during a case.
  • Making a recording of a hearing, whether a visual or sound recording, will become possible.

It is not yet clear when other parts of previous - as yet unimplemented - KEI legislation will be introduced, such as the merger of summons and applications proceedings into one type of proceeding (procesinleiding), and the intended tighter deadlines for procedural steps.

Team

Related news

08.07.2020 NL law
Dutch State breached duty of care in providing information to victims and surviving relatives of plane crash

Short Reads - Earlier this year, the District Court in The Hague ruled that the Dutch State is liable vis-à-vis the victims and surviving relatives of a 1992 plane crash in Faro, Portugal. The State was found liable because it is responsible for the information provided by the Dutch Aviation Safety Board (a government agency) to the victims and surviving relatives. This information, on the causes of the crash was deemed by the court to be incorrect and incomplete.

Read more

02.07.2020 NL law
Aansprakelijkheid van de Staat bij vliegtuigcrash in Faro

Articles - In haar uitspraak van 8 januari 2020 oordeelde Rechtbank Den Haag dat de Nederlandse Staat onrechtmatig heeft gehandeld jegens de slachtoffers en nabestaanden van de vliegramp in Faro (Portugal) in 1992, waarbij een Nederlands toestel was betrokken. De onrechtmatigheid is gelegen in onjuiste dan wel onvolledige informatieverstrekking over de oorzaken van deze vliegramp door de toenmalige Raad voor de Luchtvaart, inmiddels opgegaan in de Onderzoeksraad voor Veiligheid (‘Raad’). 

Read more

07.07.2020 NL law
UBO-register gaat van start op 27 september 2020

Short Reads - Vandaag (7 juli 2020) is bekend geworden dat het UBO-register live gaat op 27 september 2020. De Wet tot implementatie van het UBO-register (“Implementatiewet”) en het bijbehorende inwerkingtredingsbesluit zijn vandaag in het Staatsblad verschenen. De wet treedt (deels) al op 8 juli 2020 in werking. Het betreft de verplichting voor rechtspersonen om informatie over hun UBO’s te verzamelen en bij te houden en de verplichting voor stichtingen om uitkeringen van 25 procent of minder bij te houden.

Read more

27.05.2020 NL law
Accountants advising in real estate transactions: be aware of penalties in mortgage deeds

Short Reads - The Court of Appeal of Arnhem-Leeuwarden ruled on 3 March 2020 that an accountant did not properly advise her client with respect to a sale of real estate (ECLI:NL:GHARL:2020:1875). In her research concerning the consequences of the sale, the accountant had failed to properly review the contracts between the seller and the financier of the real estate. The accountant had therefore acted unlawfully.

Read more

07.07.2020 NL law
Actualiteiten bescherming Nederlandse ondernemingen

Short Reads - Het afgelopen half jaar zijn er verschillende ontwikkelingen geweest op het gebied van bescherming van Nederlandse ondernemingen. COVID-19 zorgde daarbij voor een stroomversnelling. De verslechterde economische situatie als gevolg van COVID-19 maakt dat ondernemingen sneller bloot kunnen komen te staan aan ongewenste overnames of investeringen. Het Kabinet biedt ondernemingen handvatten ter bescherming tegen ongewenste overnames en investeringen als de nationale veiligheid in het geding komt.

Read more