Articles

GDPR is effective: Will GDPR guidelines from national authorities be binding?

Stibbe - Will GDPR guidelines from national authorities be binding?

GDPR is effective: Will GDPR guidelines from national authorities be binding?

31.05.2018 EU law

GDPR is now fully effective. Preparing your company for the application of this new regulation requires a correct understanding of its principles. We highlighted a series of 12 common misconceptions regarding the interpretation of the GDPR.

Will GDPR guidelines from national authorities be binding?

Doubts exist as to the binding effects of guidelines issued by the different national authorities that further elaborate the different aspects of the GDPR. This could lead to potentially contradictory instructions for multinational corporate groups that have subsidiaries in different Member States where the corresponding data protection authorities could have issued differing guidelines on the application of a same provision of the GDPR.

In that respect, the interpretation adopted by a national authority on specific provisions of the GDPR will only be binding for those companies (or groups of companies) whose “main establishment” (i.e., the place where decisions on data processing are taken in the European Union) is located in the territory of the country in question.

In any event, and as a general rule under the GDPR, the European Data Protection Committee holds an ultimate power to interpret any provision on a number of subject matters listed in Article 70 (including, for example, those related to profiling, notification of security breaches, international data transfers, or sanctions).

 

Stibbe, together with Chiomenti, Cuatrecasas, GIDE and Gleiss Lutz, have gathered this useful information, reflecting some common misconceptions about the implementation of the GDPR.

Team

Related news

22.07.2021 NL law
Towards a European legal framework for the development and use of Artificial Intelligence

Short Reads - Back in 2014, Stephen Hawking said, “The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race.” Although the use of artificial intelligence is nothing new and dates back to Alan Turing (the godfather of computational theory), prominent researchers – along with Stephen Hawking – have expressed their concerns about the unregulated use of AI systems and their impact on society as we know it.

Read more

18.06.2021 NL law
FAQ: Wat houdt het Wetsvoorstel elektronische gegevensuitwisseling in de zorg (Wegiz) in en wat is de verhouding tot de AVG?

Short Reads - (Digitale) gegevensuitwisseling in de zorg is een actueel thema. Illustratief is een item bij EenVandaag van april 2021 waarin de analoge werkwijze bij gegevensuitwisseling in de zorg wordt aangekaart, maar ook dit artikel in het NRC van afgelopen maand waarin verslag werd gedaan van een datalek waardoor duizenden gevoelige patiëntgegevens op straat kwamen te liggen. 

Read more

19.07.2021 BE law
One year of Schrems II: a state of affairs for international data transfers

Articles - International data transfers have been the subject of intense debates ever since the Court of Justice issued its landmark judgement of Schrems I, on 6 October 2015. The intensity of the debate was further reinforced since the Schrems II decision one year ago, on 16 July 2020. The decision annulled the U.S. Privacy Shield and severely tightened the rules on the use of standard contractual clauses (“SCCs”).

Read more

18.05.2021 NL law
Kroniek: De bestuursrechtelijke aspecten van de AVG

Articles - Tom Barkhuysen, Steven Bastiaans en Fatma Çapkurt (Universiteit Leiden) schreven samen de eerste editie van de nieuwe jaarlijkse NTB kroniek: de bestuursrechtelijke aspecten van de AVG. Hierin bespreken zij onder meer de meest relevante (bestuursrechtelijke) jurisprudentie van het afgelopen jaar op het gebied van de AVG.

Read more