Short Reads

Countdown 5 weeks until GDPR : How should valid consent be proven?

Stibbe - How should valid consent be proven?

Countdown 5 weeks until GDPR : How should valid consent be proven?

19.04.2018 EU law

Only 5 more weeks to go before the GDPR becomes fully effective. Preparing your company for the application of this new regulation requires a correct understanding of its principles. Each week, we highlight one particular misconception regarding the interpretation of the GDPR.

How should valid consent be proven?

Article 7 of the GDPR reads: “the controller shall be able to demonstrate that the data subject has consented to processing of his or her personal data”. However, the GDPR does not contain specific, compulsory provisions in relation to the conditions for proving how the consent was given or obtained.

In that respect, the GDPR is inconsistent with the provisions of certain previous national legislations implementing Directive 95/46/EC (such as, e.g., the Italian Legislative Decree no. 196 of June 30, 2003, whereby the data subject’s consent could be deemed to be effective only if it is “documented in writing”).  

As a consequence, data controllers have the right to demonstrate how the valid consent was obtained by using any means allowed under their legal systems. In that respect, the use of any means for keeping a record of the data subjects’ consent - such as, for example, written statements, also statements stored by electronic means, or tick boxes to be set on internet websites specifically addressing the consent to be sought for the envisaged data processing activities - could be recommended.

Stibbe, together with Chiomenti, Cuatrecasas, GIDE and Gleiss Lutz, have gathered this useful information, reflecting some common misconceptions about the implementation of the GDPR.

Team

Related news

29.07.2020 NL law
Over temperaturen ten tijde van corona

Articles - Met haar standpunt ten aanzien van het meten van temperaturen van werknemers, geeft de Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) verduidelijking over de reikwijdte van haar toezicht. Deze nuancering houdt in dat, als er geen sprake is van verwerking van persoonsgegevens, de AVG niet geldt en de AP dus niet handhavend kan optreden.

Read more

03.07.2020 NL law
E-book NOW-2: Second Temporary Emergency Bridging Measure Work Retention

Articles - On 17 March 2020, the Dutch cabinet announced the first emergency package of support measures to alleviate the economic consequences of the corona crisis. This emergency package inter alia comprised the First Temporary Emergency Bridging Measure for the purpose of Work Retention (“NOW-1”) and the Temporary Bridging Measure for Self-Employed Persons (“Tozo-1”).

Read more

27.07.2020 NL law
Outsourcing laws and Regulation in the Netherlands – 2020

Articles - Are there any additional legal or regulatory requirements for outsourcing transactions undertaken by government or public sector bodies? What formalities are required to transfer, lease or license assets on an outsourcing transaction? Or, What are the most material legal or regulatory requirements and issues concerning data security and data protection that may arise on an outsourcing transaction?

Read more

03.07.2020 NL law
E-book NOW-2: Tweede tijdelijke noodmaatregel overbrugging voor behoud van werkgelegenheid

Articles - Op 17 maart 2020 kondigde het kabinet het eerste noodpakket aan met steunmaatregelen om de economische gevolgen van de coronacrisis te dempen. Onderdeel van dit noodpakket zijn onder andere de Eerste tijdelijke noodmaatregel overbrugging voor behoud van werkgelegenheid (“NOW-1”) en de Tijdelijke overbruggingsregeling zelfstandige ondernemers (“Tozo-1”).

Read more