Short Reads

English Court enforces arbitral award including a contractual penalty

English Court enforces arbitral award including a contractual penalty

05.02.2016 EU law

The English High Court has enforced a Swiss-seated arbitral award (the Award) issued by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), notwithstanding that the Award ordered a payment representing enforcement of a contractual penalty.

The claimant entered into two contracts with an Italian football club regarding the sale of financial rights consisting of the "registration rights" of a football player. The contracts required payment by instalments. The second contract was governed by Swiss private law and provided for arbitration under the rules of the CAS. After the football club had failed to pay a sum due, the claimant launched arbitration proceedings. The CAS arbitration panel ordered that the football club pay a sum which included the payments due and an additional Penalty Sum on the basis of a provision of Swiss law, providing that a judge should reduce a contractual penalty which is considered excessive. On appeal by the club, the Award was upheld by the Swiss court. The claimant subsequently sought to enforce the Award in England.

Punishing clauses are not enforceable under English law. The Court did however not consider that the Award of the penalty was contrary to public policy regulation for the purposes of Article V(II) of the New York Convention 1958. The Court concluded that the prohibition of the enforcement of penalty clauses does not protect a "universal principle of morality" and the penalty clause was not "injurious to the public good" to the extent that enforcement thereof should automatically be refused.  On this basis, the governing law as applied by the CAS arbitration panel was considered by the Court. The parties had chosen Swiss law as the law governing the contract and the CAS had exercised its power to reduce the penalty, so that this reduction was found compliant with Swiss law.

The decision is groundbreaking in the context of international transactions, in which the parties may choose a governing law of a particular jurisdiction to govern their contractual obligations, in casu Swiss law, but may look to another jurisdiction for enforcement.  It is particularly important given that penalty clauses are a relatively regular feature in transactions in many sectors and jurisdictions. 

 

Team

Related news

16.01.2018 BE law
Het instrumentendecreet: een eerste analyse

Articles - De Vlaamse regering broedt op een uitbreiding van de huidige instrumenten om projecten nog flexibeler te realiseren. Op de ministerraad van 12 januari 2018 keurden de ministers een voorontwerp van instrumentendecreet goed. Vooral de verhandelbare ontwikkelingsrechten springen in het oog. Die rechten zouden bijvoorbeeld eigenaars van een stuk grond buiten de stad, recht geven op een vergelijkbare kavel in de stad. Ook de planschadevergoeding wordt verhoogd tot 100% van de waardevermindering. Hierna een overzicht van alle geplande instrumenten.

Read more

16.01.2018 NL law
Overview of Legislative Proposal on Collective Action (NL) - As amended by the Amendment Bill of 11 January 2018

Articles - In the Netherlands, it is possible for a representative entity to bring a "collective action" on an "opt-out basis" under article 3:305a of the Dutch Civil Code (the "DCC"). However, under the current provisions in Dutch law, the representative entity is not entitled to claim monetary damages. This limitation is likely to be removed in the not too distant future.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy and Cookie Policy