Short Reads

Luxembourg will change its IP tax regime – The OECD’s “nexus approach”

Luxembourg will change its IP tax regime – The OECD’s “nexus approach”

Luxembourg will change its IP tax regime – The OECD’s “nexus approach”

27.03.2015 LU law

Luxembourg Minister of Finance Pierre Gramegna announced on 3 March 2015, in his answer to a parliamentary question on patent box, that the Luxembourg intellectual property (IP) tax regime will soon be amended so that is aligned with the so-called “modified nexus approach”.

In the framework of the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) action plan, members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) discussed several approaches to requiring substantial activities and presence for the application of favorable IP tax regimes. In November 2014, a joint proposal for a nexus-based approach was submitted by Germany and the United Kingdom was submitted. This proposal has been accepted by the OECD and has been laid down in the document “OECD/G20 BEPS Project - Action 5: Agreement on Modified Nexus Approach for IP Regimes”, which contains the following provisions:

  1. Under the so-called “nexus approach”, a particular emphasis is placed on the existence of a substantial economic activity. More precisely, income derived from eligible IP rights may benefit from a favorable tax treatment in proportion of the research and development expenditures incurred by the taxpayer in relation to the said IP rights. Additionally, under certain circumstances, an up-lift of the eligible expenditures might be increased by 30%.
  2. As soon as the “nexus approach” is introduced in the relevant countries and in any event after 30 June 2016, the existing IP regime should be closed to new entrants. According to Mr. Gramegna, in Luxembourg, a grandfathering clause will allow all taxpayers benefitting from the current IP regime to keep such entitlement until 30 June 2021.
  3. By June 2015, the OECD should provide further guidelines to apply a practical approach to trace and identify eligible expenditures and closely monitor the transition period to avoid any abuse of the grandfathering provisions by new entrants. Moreover, the definition of qualifying IP rights will need to be amended in order to include patents and equivalent assets, whereas trademarks should be ruled out.

For what concerns Luxembourg, Mr Gramegna informed the Luxembourg parliament that the legislative process will start in 2015, as to adapt the Luxembourg IP regime (embedded in Article 50 bis of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law) to the new, recommended international standard.

What to consider?

  • Any eligible IP holders that wish to benefit from the current Luxembourg IP regime may still implement an IP holding structure until 30 June 2016.
  • Holders of eligible IP rights that carry out already an activity in Luxembourg may continue relying on the Luxembourg IP tax regime without any changes until 30 June 2021.
  • Luxembourg companies and taxpayers should properly assess their status and eventually reorganize their IP rights holding activity in line with the new rules.

Related news

11.06.2018 NL law
Legislative proposal on changes to the Dutch CIT fiscal unity made public

Short Reads - On 22 February 2018 the European Court of Justice ('ECJ') decided on two cases (C-398/16 and C-399/16), which are relevant for purposes of the 'per-element-approach' concerning the Dutch corporate income tax ('CIT') fiscal unity regime. To mitigate the (negative financial) impact of the decisions of the ECJ, the Dutch State Secretary announced last year that new legislation (with retroactive effect to 25 October 2017) will be introduced to amend the CIT fiscal unity regime.

Read more

09.05.2018 EU law
Proposed EU Directive to help companies move across borders

Short Reads - On 25 April 2018 the European Commission proposed a new directive, amending the EU Directive 2017/1132 on company law. The proposed rules should support companies in moving from one EU country to another, i.e. cross-border mergers, divisions or conversions. However, the proposed rules for cross-border divisions and conversions will also require companies to get prior consent from a competent national authority before moving. Who will act as such authority is not clear yet.

Read more

Our website uses cookies: third party analytics cookies to best adapt our website to your needs & cookies to enable social media functionalities. For more information on the use of cookies, please check our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Please note that you can change your cookie opt-ins at any time via your browser settings.

Privacy – en cookieverklaring